Author Topic: Conky ?? (NUKED)  (Read 5434 times)

Offline longtom

  • PCLinuxOS Tester
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3339
  • Satellite Station Africa
Re: Conky ?? (NUKED)
« Reply #45 on: May 16, 2011, 03:05:36 AM »
Thank you Meemaw - most appreciated !  :D
Regards longtom

PCLinuxOS KDE 32bit
Intel Core 2 Duo E2200 / 2.2 GHz
2GB Ram
Nvidia GT610

Offline Meemaw

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2729
  • Never stop learning!
Re: Conky ?? (NUKED)
« Reply #46 on: May 16, 2011, 02:46:28 PM »
I think I'm the blind, I can't find the needed lines  ??? 
Maybe tomorow

I think it was around line 145 (out of the 1700 lines in the page source)... at least mine was, and I don't think the list would be too much different for you.....

Thank you Meemaw - most appreciated !  :D

You are very welcome!!!!
 ;D

Meemaw
PCLinuxOS Magazine Asst. Editor



We miss you, Joble!!!

Offline LKJ

  • PCLinuxOS Tester
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1957
Re: Conky ?? (NUKED)
« Reply #47 on: May 17, 2011, 12:02:32 PM »
I posted about an issue I am having and thought maybe someone here might have some insight. I am running zen-mini and the conky I use that used to work is no longer working. I do have compiz and emerald installed but it seems to not matter if they are enabled or not. Just for the heck of it I installed XFCE on top of zen-mini and lo and behold conky works in the XFCE session. Anyone have any ideas why this would be the case? I know conky did work when in gnome because I posted a screen in the Mat screenshots.

~confuzzled
Good things come in small packages. From small minds, not so much.

All walls by LKJ unless noted.
iMac 2.8 GHz Quad Core i7 12GB

Offline Meemaw

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2729
  • Never stop learning!
Re: Conky ?? (NUKED)
« Reply #48 on: May 18, 2011, 09:05:46 PM »
I posted about an issue I am having and thought maybe someone here might have some insight. I am running zen-mini and the conky I use that used to work is no longer working. I do have compiz and emerald installed but it seems to not matter if they are enabled or not. Just for the heck of it I installed XFCE on top of zen-mini and lo and behold conky works in the XFCE session. Anyone have any ideas why this would be the case? I know conky did work when in gnome because I posted a screen in the Mat screenshots.

~confuzzled

Sorry, LKJ, I don't have a clue.... I use XFCE on both my machines and conky works fine here (I even borrowed the script you posted in another thread and it works fine too! Thanks!!!)
 ;D
Meemaw
PCLinuxOS Magazine Asst. Editor



We miss you, Joble!!!

Offline Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8819
  • OBJECTS IN MIRROR... ARE LOSING
Re: Conky ?? (NUKED)
« Reply #49 on: May 18, 2011, 09:09:02 PM »
Same here, I use LXDE in my "always on" machine.

Haven't seen Dragyn later, maybe he has some opinions.
I shall pass this way but once;
any good therefore that I can do,
or any kindness that I can show
let me not defer nor neglect it,
for I shall not pass this way again.

Linux User #330412

Offline LKJ

  • PCLinuxOS Tester
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1957
Re: Conky ?? (NUKED)
« Reply #50 on: May 18, 2011, 10:20:26 PM »
thanks guys. I still don't know. now I am having problems in LXDE displaying .svg icons  :D
Good things come in small packages. From small minds, not so much.

All walls by LKJ unless noted.
iMac 2.8 GHz Quad Core i7 12GB

Offline Neal ManBear

  • Administrator
  • Super Villain
  • *****
  • Posts: 15829
  • LXDE! Coffee, Bacon and Cheesecake!
Re: Conky ?? (NUKED)
« Reply #51 on: May 18, 2011, 10:44:04 PM »
thanks guys. I still don't know. now I am having problems in LXDE displaying .svg icons  :D

So check your thread on the subject.

Offline rotaj

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16
Re: Conky ?? (NUKED)
« Reply #52 on: May 26, 2011, 02:14:09 PM »
I don't know if this is related, but my Intel Atom based systems don't have a problem with conky staying on the desktop.

However, my other two systems with an AMD mobo w/nvidia graphics have problems keeping conky on the alpha level of the desktop.
« Last Edit: June 07, 2011, 02:49:22 PM by rotaj »