« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Is an XP guest safer from malware?  (Read 2974 times)

Offline Maurice

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1133
Is an XP guest safer from malware?
« on: March 03, 2011, 05:49:41 PM »
I have Pclos dual booting with XP plus I also have Windows XP as a guest in Pclos.

As a guest, is it as vulnerable to malware as the normally installed XP is or is it somehow 'protected' by being in a virtual box?

Thanks
« Last Edit: March 03, 2011, 05:52:46 PM by Maurice »
Logged
PcLinuxos 2012.02, Kde, dual booted with XP on custom built Desktop, Intel Core 2 Quad  cpu @ 2.4ghz, DG33FB mb, 4gb ram, Nvidia 8600 (512mb), Samsung (500gb) sata

"War does not determine who is right only who is left." Bertrand Russell

AndrzejL

  • Guest
Re: Is an XP guest safer from malware?
« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2011, 05:58:54 PM »
Vulnerable if connected to internet... VBox is not a "sandboxing" tool.

Regards.

Andy
Logged

Offline T6

  • Super Villain
  • ******
  • Posts: 19051
  • xmas is comming!
Re: Is an XP guest safer from malware?
« Reply #2 on: March 03, 2011, 06:07:30 PM »
you need to put antivirus, enable firewall and don't open suspicious files

a virtual machines is just a machine with limited access to your real hardware, nothing special can be added to make it more secure without risking the stability
Logged
"If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe."

Carl Sagan

Offline parnote

  • PCLinuxOS Tester
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 4453
  • The truth is out there ... PCLinuxOS!
Re: Is an XP guest safer from malware?
« Reply #3 on: March 03, 2011, 06:12:32 PM »
Agree with T6 and AndrzejL.

Win-anything isn't secure, even if ran in a virtual machine. You will still need to run anti-virus, anti-malware and anti-spyware software, if you want Win-anything to remain secure. However, if your virtual box copy becomes corrupted by any of the aforementioned plagues, you can either just reinstall, or even better yet, restore it from a pristine copy of your virtual machine (provided you kept a backup of your VirtualBox VDI file). Furthermore, any mal-anything that Windows-anything picks up should stay isolated to only that virtual machine, and should not have any ill effects on your host.

parnote
Logged
PCLinuxOS Magazine Chief Editor

Linux Registered User #485009

In a world without walls, who needs Windows?

PCLinuxOS Wiki: Contribute tips/tricks/how-to's!

Offline ElCuervo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4147
  • I'm walking on sunshine!
Re: Is an XP guest safer from malware?
« Reply #4 on: March 03, 2011, 07:00:46 PM »
I would say it depends on you. If you don't surf porn and other stupid websites, it's relatively safe. I have had WinXP running for over two years as an unprotected guest, and not once has anything bad happened. However, I don't do any web surfing on Windows - but then why would I? It's a simple mouse click to Firefox in Linux!
Logged
"If there were no change, there would be no butterflies" - Walt Disney

http://linuxcounter.net/cert/433721.png

Offline Maurice

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1133
Re: Is an XP guest safer from malware?
« Reply #5 on: March 03, 2011, 07:10:15 PM »
Thanks for those very prompt replies chaps.

So now I know. ;D ;D
Logged
PcLinuxos 2012.02, Kde, dual booted with XP on custom built Desktop, Intel Core 2 Quad  cpu @ 2.4ghz, DG33FB mb, 4gb ram, Nvidia 8600 (512mb), Samsung (500gb) sata

"War does not determine who is right only who is left." Bertrand Russell

Offline cphayes0882

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16
Re: Is an XP guest safer from malware?
« Reply #6 on: March 03, 2011, 07:16:28 PM »
Exactly, no porn and XP will run perfect forever....
Logged

Offline T6

  • Super Villain
  • ******
  • Posts: 19051
  • xmas is comming!
Re: Is an XP guest safer from malware?
« Reply #7 on: March 03, 2011, 07:17:18 PM »
no porn?

terrible...
Logged
"If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe."

Carl Sagan

Offline Archie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8838
  • Aurum nostrum non est aurum vulgi.
Re: Is an XP guest safer from malware?
« Reply #8 on: March 03, 2011, 07:27:24 PM »
How about if one takes a snapshot of say, an XP install with everything you need but the internet is not connected? Then everytime one finishes with a session, they can always discard any current session which might be infected and revert back to that perfectly healthy snapshot?

That is possible.  :)  8)  ???
Logged
Since 2006 | LiCo 401868 | Bare Metal | What is necessary is never unwise. --Sarek, 2258.42

Offline T6

  • Super Villain
  • ******
  • Posts: 19051
  • xmas is comming!
Re: Is an XP guest safer from malware?
« Reply #9 on: March 03, 2011, 07:29:08 PM »
yes but why bother?

i prefer to use pclinux, no snapshots required, not much to worry here
Logged
"If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe."

Carl Sagan

Offline Archie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8838
  • Aurum nostrum non est aurum vulgi.
Re: Is an XP guest safer from malware?
« Reply #10 on: March 03, 2011, 08:18:25 PM »
Then if it is easy to revert to a healthy XP install after infections, one does not have to install anti-virus software and can surf all the porn site they want ... done in virtual state.

It would be wise not to enable Shared Folder, especially if they have read/write access to any of your Linux folders.
Logged
Since 2006 | LiCo 401868 | Bare Metal | What is necessary is never unwise. --Sarek, 2258.42

Offline Maurice

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1133
Re: Is an XP guest safer from malware?
« Reply #11 on: March 03, 2011, 08:42:46 PM »
There's an interesting article on this at dedoimedo.com

You do not need anti-virus software. You do not need it in Windows, nor Linux. Blacklisting is an obsolete method of maintaining security of your operating system.
Logged
PcLinuxos 2012.02, Kde, dual booted with XP on custom built Desktop, Intel Core 2 Quad  cpu @ 2.4ghz, DG33FB mb, 4gb ram, Nvidia 8600 (512mb), Samsung (500gb) sata

"War does not determine who is right only who is left." Bertrand Russell

Offline Archie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8838
  • Aurum nostrum non est aurum vulgi.
Re: Is an XP guest safer from malware?
« Reply #12 on: March 03, 2011, 08:48:34 PM »
Just an after thought... how much approximately would a CPU+RAM be using when running an anti-virus program both in the background and a manual scan?
Logged
Since 2006 | LiCo 401868 | Bare Metal | What is necessary is never unwise. --Sarek, 2258.42

Offline Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8823
  • OBJECTS IN MIRROR... ARE LOSING
Re: Is an XP guest safer from malware?
« Reply #13 on: March 03, 2011, 10:21:46 PM »
Do you want a light Anti Virus that does just what the others do and it's free? I just downloaded Placebo AV

Check it if you want  ;)  http://www.doxdesk.com/updates/2008.html#u20080129-placebo

I have it now in my taskbar and I'm sending it to all my friends   ;D
Logged
I shall pass this way but once;
any good therefore that I can do,
or any kindness that I can show
let me not defer nor neglect it,
for I shall not pass this way again.

Linux User #330412

Offline Archie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8838
  • Aurum nostrum non est aurum vulgi.
Re: Is an XP guest safer from malware?
« Reply #14 on: March 03, 2011, 11:16:46 PM »
Gotta love that fanfare ... Until then...

That'll scare all potential infections. Nothing to see, please proceed. And the Plus Pro is a steal for $30!

Now, where did I put that rope?



;D
Logged
Since 2006 | LiCo 401868 | Bare Metal | What is necessary is never unwise. --Sarek, 2258.42

Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
« previous next »