Author Topic: April 13 vs. April 15 release  (Read 952 times)

Offline boehmb

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 25
April 13 vs. April 15 release
« on: April 18, 2010, 09:37:31 AM »
Are there any significant differences between the April 13th (695MB) release and the April 15th (694MB) release?  I installed the April 13th version and it is working perfectly.  Synaptic has been doing updates with no problems.

Offline pinoc

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2880
    • other projects...
Re: April 13 vs. April 15 release
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2010, 09:41:19 AM »
the only difference with the April 15th release is that the kernel was replaced to the default bfs-kernel, see also here.
regards,
-p.

Offline menotu

  • PCLinuxOS Tester
  • Super Villain
  • *******
  • Posts: 15506
  • ┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐
Re: April 13 vs. April 15 release
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2010, 09:46:38 AM »
And if you want to install and run the .bfs kernel just install it with Synaptic.

If you're unsure which kernel you currently have, open a terminal and type:

uname - a <press enter>

And that will show ya.
PCLinuxOS 32bit KDE 4.10.4; kernel-3.4.11-pclos1.bfs & 64bit 3.4.38bfs; NVidia GeForce 8400GS 1GB 310.19 driver

Sony Vaio SVE1513A4ESI Laptop, Intel Core i5, 2.6GHz, 6GB RAM, 750GB, 15.6" Intel HD Graphics 4000

Offline boehmb

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 25
Re: April 13 vs. April 15 release
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2010, 10:01:25 AM »
What is the difference?  Does the bfs kernal fix something?

Offline boehmb

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 25
Re: April 13 vs. April 15 release
« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2010, 10:07:32 AM »
Update...I just read about bfs schduling and will leave my kernel in place.  Thanks for the replies.  PCLOS working perfectly here on a dual-core Pentium 3.3 Ghz, 2GB ram, Geforce 8800GT, 10,000-rpm drive.

Offline menotu

  • PCLinuxOS Tester
  • Super Villain
  • *******
  • Posts: 15506
  • ┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐
Re: April 13 vs. April 15 release
« Reply #5 on: April 18, 2010, 10:08:56 AM »
What is the difference?  Does the bfs kernal fix something?

Some people report that it speeds up there system.

The .a64 kernel = for AMD CPUs

The .pae kernel = if you have 4GB of ram memory it will see all of it (whereas the other kernels will only see approx between 3GB to 3.5GB)

Note: if you do install a new kernel you have to reboot and that reboot can take a good few minutes as it needs to do its stuff first, but after that boot times should be back to normal
PCLinuxOS 32bit KDE 4.10.4; kernel-3.4.11-pclos1.bfs & 64bit 3.4.38bfs; NVidia GeForce 8400GS 1GB 310.19 driver

Sony Vaio SVE1513A4ESI Laptop, Intel Core i5, 2.6GHz, 6GB RAM, 750GB, 15.6" Intel HD Graphics 4000

Offline MCP

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 386
Re: April 13 vs. April 15 release
« Reply #6 on: April 18, 2010, 10:33:11 AM »
I have an AMD Phenom II X3 processor with 4 gig ram.  Would changing to either the .a64 or .pae kernel be recommended?  Or is my processor still a little too new to benefit from the other kernels?

MCP

Offline YouCanToo

  • PCLinuxOS Tester
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 5383
  • Location: Lebanon, OR., USA
    • Spreading the word.......
Re: April 13 vs. April 15 release
« Reply #7 on: April 18, 2010, 11:38:23 AM »
I have an AMD Phenom II X3 processor with 4 gig ram.  Would changing to either the .a64 or .pae kernel be recommended?  Or is my processor still a little too new to benefit from the other kernels?

MCP

Like Menotu posted above. If you want to see all your memory and not just 3.2 - 3.5 gig than use the .pae kernel.  If that is not a big deal to you than use the .a64 kernel. No your processor in not too new to benefit from using either.
 




Be sure to visit the NEW Knowledge Base


Linux is user-friendly- it's just picky who its friends are!

Offline ternor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1837
Re: April 13 vs. April 15 release
« Reply #8 on: April 19, 2010, 04:03:30 AM »
Are these releases the final 2010 iso or are they beta?  I can't find any formal announcement.

Offline menotu

  • PCLinuxOS Tester
  • Super Villain
  • *******
  • Posts: 15506
  • ┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐
Re: April 13 vs. April 15 release
« Reply #9 on: April 19, 2010, 04:10:11 AM »
Are these releases the final 2010 iso or are they beta?  I can't find any formal announcement.

Yup - they are final 2010 releases. No more big installs, we can all just "roll" along doing Synaptic updates
PCLinuxOS 32bit KDE 4.10.4; kernel-3.4.11-pclos1.bfs & 64bit 3.4.38bfs; NVidia GeForce 8400GS 1GB 310.19 driver

Sony Vaio SVE1513A4ESI Laptop, Intel Core i5, 2.6GHz, 6GB RAM, 750GB, 15.6" Intel HD Graphics 4000

Offline ternor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1837
Re: April 13 vs. April 15 release
« Reply #10 on: April 19, 2010, 04:20:04 AM »
Thanks menotu.