It may seem a bit picky, but my post that F.Luent complained of not providing something to "make it go" was not about the code or compiling the code. Please re-read it. You'll see that it was about line structure.
As I said when I was nominated to teach: "Teacher?" Me? Are you out of your ever-loving minds? I don't know enough to teach, though I do appreciate the honour. If I tried to teach the subject, we'd all be in trouble.
That was my attempt to start teaching. It appears to have failed horribly on the start up. Like my previous attempt to start a discussion on the symbols (I started off with { and } and said that what is between is a block of code.), it was something that interested me.
TheChief,
If you would do the teaching, I'd be grateful.
Neal:Don't be so hard on yourself. We're friends here, just trying to learn a little bit and have fun in the process. Each example given will lead to questions, which shouldn't be viewed as complaints, just a place to pick up from the last lesson.
Chomp pretty much showed what was needed to get the code to compile, which is just slightly different from what I did. Had he not already posted the answer for
F.Luent, I would have.
You already said we shouldn't expect to have each example in a compilable format, and that's fine. If someone asks what else is needed, either you, or any one of us playing with this, can answer, if one of us figure it out. It's good practice for the students, not meant to put pressure on the teacher. As we move along, anyone can take a shot at playing teacher, if they come up with something they've figured out and think would be interesting to the rest of us.
There are bound to be bumps in the road as we go along, until we get a few lessons done, and that's to be expected. We'll get to where thing go more smoothly after we get more familiar with what is working and learn, in the process, what could be improved on. Until we get the rough spots sanded down, hang loose, my friend.
