Author Topic: Multiple versions of glibc [SOLVED]  (Read 2092 times)

Offline Archie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8838
  • Aurum nostrum non est aurum vulgi.
Multiple versions of glibc [SOLVED]
« on: October 06, 2009, 09:30:48 PM »
I have updated and now upped on KDE 4.3.2 together with the newest glibc.

My issue is a Synaptic warning that I have multiple glibc instaled - glibc#2.4-7 and glibc 2.10.1-2. Together with the warning is an instruction to allow multiple glibc but somehow I don't think that's the case.

My question is would it be safe to remove the older version? Would removing the older version affect the stability I am now experiencing with KDE 4.3.2? Are there system apps that are still attached to the old glibc version? Or should I just allow multiple instances of it on my system?

Thank you in advance for any advice.

Archie
« Last Edit: October 07, 2009, 10:39:33 AM by Archie »
Since 2006 | LiCo 401868 | Bare Metal | What is necessary is never unwise. --Sarek, 2258.42


Offline muungwana

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6269
Re: Multiple versions of glibc
« Reply #1 on: October 06, 2009, 09:52:00 PM »

the newer one should be backward compatible with the old one ..hence, all apps that work with the old one should also work with the new one but the reverse is not true as all apps build against the new one will not work with the old one ..

..i am mostly wondering how you got yourself into that position as most people with issues are those with less than 10 posts and who didnt update the way its recommended

both libraries goes in /lib/i686 .."find /lib/i686 -name *libc*" produces:
/lib/i686/libc.so.6
/lib/i686/libc-2.10.1.so
the first being result a link to the second
.. 3 things are certain in life : death, taxes and software bloat ..
.. tell me something i don't know, something i can use as i struggle to reason with the world around me ..

Offline Archie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8838
  • Aurum nostrum non est aurum vulgi.
Re: Multiple versions of glibc
« Reply #2 on: October 06, 2009, 09:58:58 PM »

..i am mostly wondering how you got yourself into that position as most people with issues are those with less than 10 posts and who didnt update the way its recommended


I guess I missed a post somewhere ;)

I'll leave the removal as the last thin I do today so when I reboot tomorrow and it doesn't go well, at least I will have a most recent remaster :)

Peace!
Since 2006 | LiCo 401868 | Bare Metal | What is necessary is never unwise. --Sarek, 2258.42


Offline Texstar

  • Administrator
  • Super Villain
  • *****
  • Posts: 12662
Re: Multiple versions of glibc
« Reply #3 on: October 06, 2009, 10:11:07 PM »

..i am mostly wondering how you got yourself into that position as most people with issues are those with less than 10 posts and who didnt update the way its recommended


I guess I missed a post somewhere ;)

I'll leave the removal as the last thin I do today so when I reboot tomorrow and it doesn't go well, at least I will have a most recent remaster :)

Peace!

After you remove the duplicate package go back and mark the new package for re-install just to be safe.  I suspect the multiple entries are in the rpm database. I have plans to update rpm, apt-get and Synaptic a little later on with new versions.

Thanks to everyone who donates. You keep the servers running.
Follow me on Twitter for the latest development info.

Offline Archie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8838
  • Aurum nostrum non est aurum vulgi.
Re: Multiple versions of glibc
« Reply #4 on: October 07, 2009, 10:39:08 AM »
After you remove the duplicate package go back and mark the new package for re-install just to be safe.  I suspect the multiple entries are in the rpm database. I have plans to update rpm, apt-get and Synaptic a little later on with new versions.


Did as instructed and the process was painless. Thanks, Tex. To you too, muungwana.
Since 2006 | LiCo 401868 | Bare Metal | What is necessary is never unwise. --Sarek, 2258.42