« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: (solved) Last update broke gqview  (Read 167 times)

Offline jwt873

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 149
(solved) Last update broke gqview
« on: February 16, 2013, 04:41:34 PM »
Gqview is one of my most used programs.  I manage my photo library with it and I take lots of pictures.  It's been a faithful friend for years.

I did an upgrade today and see that gqview was removed from my system.   If I try to install it, I get a dependency error.

This is a major thing for me...  Will we ever see gqview on PCLOS?

« Last Edit: February 16, 2013, 05:26:12 PM by jwt873 »
Logged
Registered Linux user #166905 -- Registered on 2000-02-21 02:52:05 -- https://linuxcounter.net/

Online pinoc

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2881
    • other projects...
Re: Last update broke gqview
« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2013, 05:11:46 PM »
Gqview is outdated and replaced by its follow up Geeqie,
-p.
Logged

Offline jwt873

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 149
Re: Last update broke gqview
« Reply #2 on: February 16, 2013, 05:25:46 PM »
Ah...   

And the functionality is pretty well the same..  Whew..   I can live with that..   Thanks!!
Logged
Registered Linux user #166905 -- Registered on 2000-02-21 02:52:05 -- https://linuxcounter.net/

Online Old-Polack

  • Administrator
  • Super Villain
  • *****
  • Posts: 11688
  • ----IOFLU----
Re: Last update broke gqview
« Reply #3 on: February 16, 2013, 07:40:24 PM »
Quote from: jwt873 on February 16, 2013, 05:25:46 PM
Ah...   

And the functionality is pretty well the same..  Whew..   I can live with that..   Thanks!!

I had the same reaction that you did, but then noticed the menu entry for Geegie, which I'd never before seen. I quickly went to a directory containing about 30 images, right clicked the first and chose Open With --> Geegie. Big sigh, when I found myself in totally familiar territory. The new name sucks, (Who chose this one, the dev's 5 year old daughter?) but the app seems solid enough.  ;D
Logged
Old-Polack

Of what use be there for joy, if not for the sharing thereof?



Lest we forget...
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »