Author Topic: Energy from water vapor  (Read 124 times)

Offline pags

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2517
  • Keep it clean.
Energy from water vapor
« on: January 22, 2013, 10:10:12 PM »
From MIT news:
Quote
MIT engineers have created a new polymer film that can generate electricity by drawing on a ubiquitous source: water vapor.

The new material changes its shape after absorbing tiny amounts of evaporated water, allowing it to repeatedly curl up and down. Harnessing this continuous motion could drive robotic limbs or generate enough electricity to power micro- and nanoelectronic devices, such as environmental sensors.

“With a sensor powered by a battery, you have to replace it periodically. If you have this device, you can harvest energy from the environment so you don't have to replace it very often,” says Mingming Ma, a postdoc at MIT’s David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research and lead author of a paper describing the new material in the Jan. 11 issue of Science.


Complete article here.

Offline russell.eberhardt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 408
Re: Energy from water vapor
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2013, 03:51:59 AM »
Funny, I've had a hygrometer for many years that works on a similar principle.

Russell
Desktop: Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3 motherboard, NVIDIA GeForce 8400GS, AMD Phenom II Quad Core Processor 3GHz, 4GB ram, 250GB + 500GB SATA HD,

Offline menotu

  • PCLinuxOS Tester
  • Super Villain
  • *******
  • Posts: 15296
  • ┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐
Re: Energy from water vapor
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2013, 04:54:13 AM »
Interesting
PCLinuxOS 32bit KDE 4.10.1; kernel-3.4.11-pclos1.bfs & 64bit 3.2.18bfs; NVidia GeForce 8400GS 1GB 310.19 driver

Sony Vaio SVE1513A4ESI Laptop, Intel Core i5, 2.6GHz, 6GB RAM, 750GB, 15.6" Intel HD Graphics 4000

Offline pags

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2517
  • Keep it clean.
Re: Energy from water vapor
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2013, 09:27:44 AM »
Funny, I've had a hygrometer for many years that works on a similar principle.

Russell


I'm guessing (guessing, I say... ;) ), that the difference is in the amount of work that can be performed by the mechanism involved...for the hygrometer, it just has to be enough to register a difference to perform the measurement (usually over a "long" period of time)...

Still, I agree, the basic physically principles are likely similar, if not the same.