Author Topic: Microsoft Security Essentials loses AV-TEST cert: (detects only 64% in Win 7)  (Read 171 times)

Offline menotu

  • PCLinuxOS Tester
  • Super Villain
  • *******
  • Posts: 15316
  • ┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐
By Simon Sharwood - Security -  30th November 2012

Microsoft Security Essentials, Redmond’s free antivirus tool for home users and business with up to ten PCs, can detect just 64 per cent of zero-day threats when running under Windows 7.

The Institute conducts tests bi-monthly and lists longitudinal data on software products’ performance.

During October the Institute rated Security Essentials 4.0 and 4.1 at just 1.5 out of 6 in terms of its ability to protect a PC, thanks largely to the 64 per cent zero-day detection rate being well below the industry average 89 per cent.

Security Essentials has lost AV-TEST’s seal before, with its September 2010 test failing to meet the lab’s criteria. It is the only one of 24 AV products for Windows 7 without the certification. Four products missed out for Windows Vista and two for Windows XP. Windows 8 AV tools are yet to go under the microscope and Microsoft is absent from AV-TEST's list of vendors thanks to the new OS' integrated protection software

While tests like these have no official standing, a look at AV-TEST’s longitudinal analysis of Security Essentials show it has consistently struggled to perform well in its malware detection and blocking tests.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/30/microsoft_security_essentials_loses_av_test_certification/
PCLinuxOS 32bit KDE 4.10.1; kernel-3.4.11-pclos1.bfs & 64bit 3.2.18bfs; NVidia GeForce 8400GS 1GB 310.19 driver

Sony Vaio SVE1513A4ESI Laptop, Intel Core i5, 2.6GHz, 6GB RAM, 750GB, 15.6" Intel HD Graphics 4000

Offline Just17

  • PCLinuxOS Tester
  • Super Villain
  • *******
  • Posts: 10690
  • MLUs Forever!
They produce the OS and it cannot protect itself ..... they produce an anti-virus to protect it and that fails too ......  where is the surprise?  ;D
MLUs rule the roost!

Linux XPS 3.4.38-pclos1.bfs  64 bit
Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q9450 @ 2.66GHz
4 GB RAM
MCP51 High Def Audio
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
PHILIPS  ‎DVD+-RW DVD8701
‎Logitech ‎BT Mini-Receiver
Afatech DTT

Offline Wildman

  • PCLinuxOS Tester
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 7556
  • Symphony for a Unstrung Tongue
They actually made it up to 64%  :o :o .....Really ??? ??? ??? That high ??? ??? ....Oh Man  :o, thats a heck of an increase from 21.2% to 64%....oh wow, Keep on they might actually be able to claim ""Almost a Detector"" status ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
We are all in the gutter,
but some of us are looking at the stars.
~Oscar Wilde~


Joe Gable, "Joble" Was my Friend..
Dave "Exwintech" has also gone on...
Linux Counter #288984

Offline YouCanToo

  • PCLinuxOS Tester
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 5337
  • Location: Lebanon, OR., USA
    • Spreading the word.......
Just another in the long line of quality products brought to you by MicroSUX




Be sure to visit the NEW Knowledge Base


Linux is user-friendly- it's just picky who its friends are!

Offline ZX80Man

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 230
  • Registered Linux User 536071
Hey guys, in all fairness, reminding you about the ms/free, witch seldom go together.
So, in the maybe 1% win7 usage I do, I do use Security Essentials.  It is a little slower and has caught a few problems for me.
OK, sure it's not the best, but in the end, even with witch-ever anti virus one chooses to protect their $ms-os$ it still will likely fail, just because it is ms.
I try to never ever, go online without using PCLOS.
Older then dirt, but still above it...