Author Topic: lvm2  (Read 1012 times)

Offline Yankee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1474
  • In theory, theory=practice, in practice ???
lvm2
« on: October 16, 2012, 03:46:46 PM »

Hi,

When I shutdown I let the PC display all messages.
It is now displaying a message relating that LVM is shutting
down, no volume groups found.   OK no problem.

This message was not previously displayed.    I don't use
or plan to use LVM, RAID, samba,  networking, etc. on this machine.
Just regular ext4 partitions auto-mounted without flex_bg.
I usually don't orchestrate a multi-boot scenario either.

Question is can I uninstall LVM2 to eliminate this unneeded
overhead ?     Probably doesn't matter but a question nonetheless.

THX


FF
ASUS EeePc 900HA netbook  1.6 Ghz Atom CPU  1GB RAM
160 GB internal HD    Seagate 250 GB USB portable drive 
Intel ‎Mobile 945GSE Integrated Graphics Controller
Atheros AR242x/AR542x Wireless Network Adapter
Intel (N10/ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio
Dynex 5-Button Wired Optical Mouse
LXDE

Offline Just17

  • PCLinuxOS Tester
  • Super Villain
  • *******
  • Posts: 10612
  • MLUs Forever!
Re: lvm2
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2012, 12:51:40 PM »
I have uninstalled the three LVM2 related packages ....  watching to see if there is any negative result  ;)

BTW, I also had spotted and wondered about that LVM message recently ......

MLUs rule the roost!

Linux XPS 3.2.18-pclos2.pae.bfs  32 bit
Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q9450 @ 2.66GHz
4 GB RAM
MCP51 High Def Audio
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
PHILIPS  ‎DVD+-RW DVD8701
‎Logitech ‎BT Mini-Receiver
Afatech DTT

Offline Yankee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1474
  • In theory, theory=practice, in practice ???
Re: lvm2
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2012, 04:49:59 PM »
I have uninstalled the three LVM2 related packages ....  watching to see if there is any negative result  ;)

BTW, I also had spotted and wondered about that LVM message recently ......

Being a strong proponent of ext4 ^flex_bg I can see no home use for LVM.
Jesus, the proponents must think I'm running a little league team or something.

email only...

Having never seen an operating Linux network, but have used IBM networks
and Windows for Workgroups networks, I think the normal ext4 FS allocations
in a non-business setting would be sufficient.   Nice to know they have the
Linux LVM capabilities and features available if needed is comforting. 

Perhaps I'll delete my LVM2 package someday if I can pinpoint it requiring
excessive overhead.

Thanks for The Response,

FF


ASUS EeePc 900HA netbook  1.6 Ghz Atom CPU  1GB RAM
160 GB internal HD    Seagate 250 GB USB portable drive 
Intel ‎Mobile 945GSE Integrated Graphics Controller
Atheros AR242x/AR542x Wireless Network Adapter
Intel (N10/ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio
Dynex 5-Button Wired Optical Mouse
LXDE

Offline Just17

  • PCLinuxOS Tester
  • Super Villain
  • *******
  • Posts: 10612
  • MLUs Forever!
Re: lvm2
« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2012, 04:59:26 PM »
I have not noticed any negative effects in the last 10 days .......  ;)

MLUs rule the roost!

Linux XPS 3.2.18-pclos2.pae.bfs  32 bit
Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q9450 @ 2.66GHz
4 GB RAM
MCP51 High Def Audio
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
PHILIPS  ‎DVD+-RW DVD8701
‎Logitech ‎BT Mini-Receiver
Afatech DTT