Cispa Replacement?

[Just17]

White House Preparing Executive Order As A Stand-In For CISPA

This isn't a huge surprise -- and last month we even discussed the possibility, but it sounds as though the White House has decided that, with the failure of Congress to pass a comprehensive cybersecurity bill (CISPA passed in the House, but the rather different Cybersecurity Act failed in the Senate), it is going to issue some sort of executive order to deal with "cybersecurity issues."

http://t.co/5uaPBTlZ

[menotu]

By Jennifer Martinez - 02/08/13

House panel to reintroduce controversial cyber bill, setting up White House fight

The bill that Rogers and Ruppersberger plan to introduce next week will be identical to the version of CISPA that passed the House last spring.

http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/281963-house-intelligence-committee-leaders-to-re-introduce-cispa-next-week-

and

White House: Executive order is 'not magical,' cyber bill still needed

http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/281477-white-house-cyber-official-executive-order-is-not-magicial-and-cyber-bill-is-needed

[menotu]

ComputerWOrld - 14 February 2013

Privacy groups protest CISPA bill

............................................

Advocacy groups Demand Progress and Fight for the Future claim they have already submitted more than 300,000 signatures from people opposing the bill via email and Twitter. The signatures have been delivered electronically to members of the U.S. House Intelligence Committee and more are being delivered electronically every hour, the two groups claimed in a statement.

According to Tiffany Cheng, a spokeswoman for Fight for the Future, the campaign to oppose CISPA began last Friday when the group first heard of plans to reintroduce CISPA. In total, more than 1 million signatures opposing the measure have been collected by several organizations, including the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and Free Press, Cheng said. So far, a PDF file containing 300,000 of those signatures has been sent to the House Intelligence Committee, she said.

In separate blog posts, rights advocacy groups the EFF and the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT) expressed adamant opposition to the legislation and urged others to join the fight.

"In seeking to promote cybersecurity information sharing, CISPA creates a sweeping exception to all privacy laws," CDT president Leslie Harris wrote in CDT's blog. "It dismantles years of hard-fought privacy protections for Americans."

CISPA was first introduced last year and was approved by the House of Representatives despite a hurricane of protests, including one from President Barack Obama, who threatened to veto the bill if it landed on his desk.

The bill's supporters, which include nearly every major industry trade group, insist that the information-sharing provisions contained in CISPA are vital to their ability to fight new cyberthreats.

In testimony before Congress on Thursday, Paul Smocer, president of BITS, the technology policy division of the influential Financial Services Roundtable, called the bill essential to improving cybersecurity.

"Given the interconnected nature of cyberspace, institutions recognize that the strongest preparations and responses to cyberattacks require collaboration beyond their own companies," Smocer said in prepared testimony. "The ability to share information more broadly is critical to our response to future attacks."

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9236800/Privacy_groups_protest_CISPA_bill_?source=rss_security&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+computerworld%2Fs%2Ffeed%2Ftopic%2F17+%28Computerworld+Security+News%29