Author Topic: Clonezilla Restore Failure on New HD [SOLVED]  (Read 7549 times)

Offline Xenaflux

  • PCLinuxOS Tester
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3834
Re: Clonezilla Restore Failure on New HD
« Reply #45 on: May 12, 2012, 12:48:16 AM »
Quote
There must be a real question there, somewhere.

OK, I am not sure if you want me to ask, to beg or to crawl on the floor and kiss your feet first , but....
How do you put 20 partitions on one HD , where I only could manage 15 at the best. wjthout Gparted complaining, moaning, groaning and threatening me to destroy all and everything.

And I have no intentions whats-o-ever to do it. I just want to know, in case you die. Someone will then have to tell the others. Hai capito ?

 ;D 8)


The great thing in this world is not so much where we stand,
as in what direction we are moving.
                                                    (Oliver Wendell Holmes )

Online Old-Polack

  • Administrator
  • Super Villain
  • *****
  • Posts: 11533
  • ----IOFLU----
Re: Clonezilla Restore Failure on New HD
« Reply #46 on: May 12, 2012, 12:57:35 AM »
Quote
There must be a real question there, somewhere.

OK, I am not sure if you want me to ask, to beg or to crawl on the floor and kiss your feet first , but....
How do you put 20 partitions on one HD , where I only could manage 15 at the best. wjthout Gparted complaining, moaning, groaning and threatening me to destroy all and everything.

And I have no intentions whats-o-ever to do it. I just want to know, in case you die. Someone will then have to tell the others. Hai capito ?

 ;D 8)




Linux fdisk will put about any number of partitions on a drive as one might want. Other partitioning tools should do the same, if they are not old versions, that are still limited to the old SCSI15 partition limit. The Linux kernel used also has a bearing on this. The newer kernels have had this ability for a while now. The 2.6.38 kernel certainly does. Also, did it not occur to you that I have more than one drive?
Old-Polack

Of what use be there for joy, if not for the sharing thereof?



Lest we forget...

Offline Xenaflux

  • PCLinuxOS Tester
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3834
Re: Clonezilla Restore Failure on New HD
« Reply #47 on: May 12, 2012, 02:06:36 AM »
Quote
Also, did it not occur to you that I have more than one drive
Grrr.  :-[

No, it did not.
I was so excited that I was going to learn something new, that.................!

Thanks for the rest.
I can go back to sleep now !
 ;D

Xena
The great thing in this world is not so much where we stand,
as in what direction we are moving.
                                                    (Oliver Wendell Holmes )

Offline bilyo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 267
Re: Clonezilla Restore Failure on New HD
« Reply #48 on: May 12, 2012, 11:12:37 AM »
Yea! It works! Of course, that's no surprise to you.
The results of "setup (hd0) scrolled off the screen after I quit and wouldn't scroll back. But, it was the same as what your wrote.

I understood most of what we did up to about your reply #38.  I need to print everything out and study it a bit to try to clear up the fuzzy spots.  If I have any questions, should I just continue this thread or is there a better way?

Can you now explain how to update the kernel or point me to an existing explanation?

You were also concerned about a statement in the fstab.

Thank you very very much. I hope you are highly paid (grin).

Online Old-Polack

  • Administrator
  • Super Villain
  • *****
  • Posts: 11533
  • ----IOFLU----
Re: Clonezilla Restore Failure on New HD
« Reply #49 on: May 12, 2012, 02:21:22 PM »
Yea! It works! Of course, that's no surprise to you.
The results of "setup (hd0) scrolled off the screen after I quit and wouldn't scroll back. But, it was the same as what your wrote.

I understood most of what we did up to about your reply #38.  I need to print everything out and study it a bit to try to clear up the fuzzy spots.  If I have any questions, should I just continue this thread or is there a better way?

Can you now explain how to update the kernel or point me to an existing explanation?

You were also concerned about a statement in the fstab.

Thank you very very much. I hope you are highly paid (grin).


Yes, this line;

# THE FOLLOWING LINE REVISED "OPTIONS" TO ALLOW user TO MOUNT /DEV/SDB2

/dev/sdb2 /media/pclos ext4 rw,suid,dev,exec,auto,user,async 0 0
 

First, being as /media is being used by the system to automatically mount removable media, and mount points are  dynamically created and removed there, any controllable mounts you want to be user mountable should instead be in /mnt. Then the mount options need to be slightly different also. Below would be a proper fstab entry to achieve the stated intent;

/dev/sdb2    /mnt/pclos    ext4    rw,user,noauto,exec,noatime    0 0

The name of the exact mountpoint directory can be anything you choose, but it needs to actually exist before the mount is made, or you'll just get an error message. Creation of the directory would be by the same mkdir (make directory) command as we used to create the /mnt/here and /mnt/there directories earlier. Once created on a regular installation, they will remain intact and reusable, until deliberately removed.

In Reply #38, are you speaking of the -o bind mount commands?

In a non running / partition, the /sys and /proc directories are empty. Explanation of the actual use of /proc is rather lengthy, so check here;

http://tldp.org/LDP/Linux-Filesystem-Hierarchy/html/proc.html

The use of /sys is not clearly defined, and may be different for different distributions, but is related to /proc in that it's only filled when the kernel is active.

To have the chroot environment totally usable, we mount the active directories from the running system to those on the inactive partition, much the same as we mount a partition, but using the -o bind option in the command. When we then do the chroot (change root) command, the system sees the inactive partition as active, and uses the applications and file system that are available on that partition when any command is executed.

The /dev directory is included to be sure all the hardware devices are recognized the same in both environments.

Upgrading a kernel is just a matter of selecting one in Synaptic, and making it for installation. A kernel-devel package will automatically be added, then click Apply as with any other upgrade, or application installation. The new kernel will become the default kernel as part of the process, so when you boot the next time, using the same boot option as before, it will be the new kernel that is used.
Old-Polack

Of what use be there for joy, if not for the sharing thereof?



Lest we forget...

Offline bilyo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 267
Re: Clonezilla Restore Failure on New HD
« Reply #50 on: May 12, 2012, 07:13:12 PM »
It is going to take me a while to digest all of that.  And, I will be away tomorrow. So, it will be the first of the week before I get back to it. See you then.

Offline bilyo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 267
Re: Clonezilla Restore Failure on New HD
« Reply #51 on: May 15, 2012, 03:02:25 PM »
I'm back to this for a while.  It seems that home repairs and honey-dos take precedents over computers ;.)  

Regarding the kernel update:  There are a bunch kernel-devel packages in the Synaptic list. The descriptions are basically the same saying that they are "stripped down version of the full kernel-source".  The file names are a little different having either .a64, bfs, pae, or pae.bfs. in the name.  The one currently installed has .bfs in the file name. Should I just load the last one on the list like that?

5/18 update: I finally found Texstar's msg from about a year ago that clarified the kernel update question. I missed it in my first search. Thanks.

5/18 Mod. Regarding the statement in the fstab:  This gets into a new issue and I will enter a new posting about it. Thanks.
« Last Edit: May 18, 2012, 09:32:11 AM by bilyo »