Author Topic: Smart package manager as alternative for Synaptic??  (Read 368 times)

Online JohnW_57

  • PCLinuxOS Tester
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2114
Smart package manager as alternative for Synaptic??
« on: April 09, 2013, 03:33:51 PM »
Smart package manager as alternative for Synaptic??

Did playing with smart package manager.
Not so easy for beginners (it have a lot of options).
Easier to roll back (for testers)
Easier to check what's is broken.
Easy to pin packages, ect... ect...
It's only in the English language (I guess).

What do you think about it?

JohnW

« Last Edit: April 09, 2013, 03:35:24 PM by JohnW_57 »
PCLinuxOS 2013 KDE4 (64 bit) on: home build system:  Intel Core 2 Quad (q6700) (2.66ghz), Asus P5K motherboard, 4 gig ddr2 memory, Asus Nvidia Geforce GTS 250 1024 mb gddr3, Crucial M4 128 SSD,  2x Samsung 500 gig HDD (sata), TSSTcorp CDDVDW SH-224BB.

Offline The Chief

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2237
Re: Smart package manager as alternative for Synaptic??
« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2013, 03:50:45 PM »
It was discussed in the magazine, http://pclosmag.com/html/Issues/200804/page04.html
some 5 years ago (by pinoc) and he seemed to like it.



Retired Senior Chief, Retired Software Engineer, Active GrandPa

Offline parnote

  • PCLinuxOS Tester
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 4436
  • The truth is out there ... PCLinuxOS!
Re: Smart package manager as alternative for Synaptic??
« Reply #2 on: April 09, 2013, 04:09:18 PM »
A lot of things can change in the 5 years since that magazine article was written. The question that comes immediately to mind is has Smart Package Manager been kept up-to-date in the repos?
PCLinuxOS Magazine Chief Editor

Linux Registered User #485009

In a world without walls, who needs Windows?

PCLinuxOS Wiki: Contribute tips/tricks/how-to's!

Online JohnW_57

  • PCLinuxOS Tester
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2114
Re: Smart package manager as alternative for Synaptic??
« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2013, 04:37:14 PM »
Quote
The question that comes immediately to mind is has Smart Package Manager been kept up-to-date in the repos?

It's actual in repository (test/testing).

JohnW
PCLinuxOS 2013 KDE4 (64 bit) on: home build system:  Intel Core 2 Quad (q6700) (2.66ghz), Asus P5K motherboard, 4 gig ddr2 memory, Asus Nvidia Geforce GTS 250 1024 mb gddr3, Crucial M4 128 SSD,  2x Samsung 500 gig HDD (sata), TSSTcorp CDDVDW SH-224BB.

Offline footstep11

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 99
  • Linux User: #63879
Re: Smart package manager as alternative for Synaptic??
« Reply #4 on: April 10, 2013, 01:48:07 AM »
I use it because it has a feature that, for some unknown reason, synaptic does not have (see my post here).
Smart has an "installed files" tab that display the list of the files installed by the selected package.

Ciao, Mauro
Desktop with Intel Core2 Duo CPU E8500 @ 3.16GHz
nVidia GeForce 9400 GT,  4GB DDR2 RAM
‎82801I (ICH9 Family) HD Audio Controller
82566DC-2 Gigabit Network Connection
PCLinuxOS 32Bit, FullMonty (KDE)
Linux kernel 3.2.18-pclos2.pae.bfs

Offline tele

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 196
Re: Smart package manager as alternative for Synaptic??
« Reply #5 on: April 18, 2013, 11:54:32 AM »
I use also Smart Package Manager 1.4.1 because sometimes I need:
 - check Content package
 - install older package (previous)

But
- delete icon in the search packages are not intuitive, I click often clean where I need search package
 ( search icon should be on the right instead of the icons clean )
- I don't see history log installed package ,
so I use this only when synaptic is not enough to do something more.

I would be happy if the:
- was the ability to remove a package with all previously installed on your system, if the relationship is not used by other programs. In urpmi this is possible but I don't tested , so I don't know.

---
- Language Translation status:     ( On the right-down you have ...— View only preferred languages ] )
https://translations.launchpad.net/smart/trunk/+translations

- Development
https://code.launchpad.net/smart

Edit:
Aaaa Something else worries me.
 - When new users update system, do not know that some a packets needs manually update,
example Libre Office , Virtualbox.
Super if manager will activate the scripts in order to update the software.
I hope this will  safe.

Edit:
I want also in manager filtr package
-> like orphaner for clean system, ( this exist in pclos -> rpmorphaner )
I want list package
 - which are not dependencies  other package
Quote
If you want to clean up your Ubuntu or Debian machine and delete unnecessary (orphaned) deb packages you can use utility deborphan.

I want also catalogs in manager , where I can istall all package needed for example kde , fce , lxde, one click.

I want see "dependency tree" in info package in manager  from spec.file. ( In rpm binary spec file exist? )


The best option that additives were used as a plug manager, then as someone does not like a heavy manager to remove the plug , example plug with filtr.

Edit:
I like also from synaptic , list package from search , this is helpfully when I 'm looking many packages for check or install, because I can back to previous search.
« Last Edit: April 20, 2013, 01:21:38 PM by tele »
---
Sorry, if my language is wrong,
you please write notice where I do mistakes, I will try to learn.

Offline ihyfr

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16
  • טראכט גוט וועט זיין גוט, מיסטאמע
    • bitmote.com
Re: Smart package manager as alternative for Synaptic??
« Reply #6 on: April 25, 2013, 01:32:40 AM »
I hope this isn't too off topic. Does smart load and search the package database faster than synaptic? Synaptic and even apt take a long time to load and search. Another computer of mine has Arch with pacman as the package manager. It somehow needs no time to load or search the package database.

Online JohnW_57

  • PCLinuxOS Tester
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2114
Re: Smart package manager as alternative for Synaptic??
« Reply #7 on: April 25, 2013, 12:21:38 PM »
I can confirm Smart works faster then Synaptic but... it depends also the speed of the ftp server (mirror) also your connection speed.
The best way is to test it on your system.

JohnW
PCLinuxOS 2013 KDE4 (64 bit) on: home build system:  Intel Core 2 Quad (q6700) (2.66ghz), Asus P5K motherboard, 4 gig ddr2 memory, Asus Nvidia Geforce GTS 250 1024 mb gddr3, Crucial M4 128 SSD,  2x Samsung 500 gig HDD (sata), TSSTcorp CDDVDW SH-224BB.