« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: wbar 2.3 broken?  (Read 1835 times)

Offline aasche

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16
wbar 2.3 broken?
« on: March 21, 2012, 05:04:35 PM »
Discovered transparency problems with new version 2.3 of wbar on Xfce: the dock is surrounded by a black box. And no, reload doesn't work :(

Tried to rollback to version 2.2.x but it's not in the repos anymore. Any suggestions?
« Last Edit: March 22, 2012, 01:35:14 AM by aasche »
Logged

Offline djohnston

  • PCLinuxOS Tester
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 6227
  • I don't do Windows
Re: wbar 2.3 broken?
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2012, 10:06:30 PM »
Sorry, I don't have XFCE installed. But the upgrade works fine on LXDE. I think I know what you're describing, though. It happens occasionally on LXDE. Try doing this. Right-click inside the black box. It's okay if the icons zoom. They won't launch on a right-click. Did the black box disappear?
Logged
Bare metal                           VBox
AMD Athlon 7750 Dual-Core    Single core
4GiB RAM                              1GiB RAM
nVidia GeForce FX 5200          64MB video
LXDE 32bit                            KDE 64bit

Registered Linux User #416378

Offline aasche

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16
Re: wbar 2.3 broken?
« Reply #2 on: March 22, 2012, 01:47:20 AM »
Quote from: djohnston on March 21, 2012, 10:06:30 PM
Try doing this. Right-click inside the black box... Did the black box disappear?
No - thats the reason why I wrote "reload doesn't work". I use wbar several years now and reload solved the problem all the time - until v2.3.
Logged

Offline Neal ManBear

  • Administrator
  • Super Villain
  • *****
  • Posts: 15847
  • LXDE! Coffee, Bacon and Cheesecake!
Re: wbar 2.3 broken?
« Reply #3 on: March 22, 2012, 02:05:06 AM »
Stop wbar. Start wbar from terminal. What feedback is given?     
Logged

Offline demilord

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 220
  • Windows not supported
Re: wbar 2.3 broken?
« Reply #4 on: March 22, 2012, 05:17:20 AM »
go to settings of wbar hit Refresh >apply.. It happens rarely to me too
Logged
Office required Windows XP or better, so I installed PCLinuxOS :D

Offline aasche

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16
Re: wbar 2.3 broken?
« Reply #5 on: March 24, 2012, 05:24:55 AM »
Quote from: Neal ManBear on March 22, 2012, 02:05:06 AM
Stop wbar. Start wbar from terminal. What feedback is given?     
nothing  :(
Logged

Offline menotu

  • PCLinuxOS Tester
  • Super Villain
  • *******
  • Posts: 15296
  • ┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐
Re: wbar 2.3 broken?
« Reply #6 on: March 24, 2012, 06:40:00 AM »
Have you tried using wbar-config to start it? 

If that works you may be able to see if changing a preference or effect(s) helps.
Logged
PCLinuxOS 32bit KDE 4.10.1; kernel-3.4.11-pclos1.bfs & 64bit 3.2.18bfs; NVidia GeForce 8400GS 1GB 310.19 driver

Sony Vaio SVE1513A4ESI Laptop, Intel Core i5, 2.6GHz, 6GB RAM, 750GB, 15.6" Intel HD Graphics 4000

Offline daniel

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3735
  • God knows, i'm not an Angel!
    • Tipps und Tricks
Re: wbar 2.3 broken?
« Reply #7 on: March 24, 2012, 12:31:03 PM »
post your .wbar file here, and we will see what goes wrong.

You find it under /home/YOU/.wbar
Logged

Offline aasche

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16
Re: wbar 2.3 broken?
« Reply #8 on: March 25, 2012, 06:08:34 AM »
Thanks a lot for your hints.  But it's IMHO a bug.
Logged

Offline daniel

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3735
  • God knows, i'm not an Angel!
    • Tipps und Tricks
Re: wbar 2.3 broken?
« Reply #9 on: March 25, 2012, 06:20:18 AM »
Quote from: aasche on March 25, 2012, 06:08:34 AM
Thanks a lot for your hints.  But it's IMHO a bug.

How can we help, when you not do what we wrote  ???
« Last Edit: March 25, 2012, 09:28:17 AM by Leiche »
Logged

Offline Neal ManBear

  • Administrator
  • Super Villain
  • *****
  • Posts: 15847
  • LXDE! Coffee, Bacon and Cheesecake!
Re: wbar 2.3 broken?
« Reply #10 on: March 25, 2012, 09:08:53 AM »
Quote from: aasche on March 25, 2012, 06:08:34 AM
Thanks a lot for your hints.  But it's IMHO a bug.
     
Your opinion? But where is the evidence? And what exactly is the bug? Sorry, but your opinion gives us nothing to work with.     

It would be better, if you would supply the requested information. Then we can begin to tract down the source of the problem.     
Logged

Offline demilord

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 220
  • Windows not supported
Re: wbar 2.3 broken?
« Reply #11 on: March 25, 2012, 05:42:28 PM »
Ill dig deeper in it.. I do have rarely that the background isnt transparent but when I refresh it goes back to normal...
Maybe it is a video driver / wbar thats not playing nice or that it is a bug... Ill supply some extra information as much as possible and whatever you wish
Logged
Office required Windows XP or better, so I installed PCLinuxOS :D

Offline daniel

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3735
  • God knows, i'm not an Angel!
    • Tipps und Tricks
Re: wbar 2.3 broken?
« Reply #12 on: March 26, 2012, 10:40:25 AM »
this is what i've



it seams not broken, or?

So please post your wbar conf file...
Logged

Offline djohnston

  • PCLinuxOS Tester
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 6227
  • I don't do Windows
Re: wbar 2.3 broken?
« Reply #13 on: March 26, 2012, 02:49:54 PM »
Quote from: Leiche on March 26, 2012, 10:40:25 AM
this is what i've



it seams not broken, or?

So please post your wbar conf file...

Sorry to interrupt (unless the original poster doesn't come back). Leiche, what icon set is that? Is it system wide or just for wbar?
Logged
Bare metal                           VBox
AMD Athlon 7750 Dual-Core    Single core
4GiB RAM                              1GiB RAM
nVidia GeForce FX 5200          64MB video
LXDE 32bit                            KDE 64bit

Registered Linux User #416378

Offline daniel

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3735
  • God knows, i'm not an Angel!
    • Tipps und Tricks
Re: wbar 2.3 broken?
« Reply #14 on: March 26, 2012, 02:51:54 PM »
Icons, that founds in www  ;)
If you want it, i will share
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »