[Resolved]I can not visit this site directly,so what I will do?

[Rudge]

julianxu, are you using "windows" to test your "access" results?

I ask because the following screen shot looks like windows to me. if you are using windows for access, it could be a redirect virus of some sort.

[julianxu]

julianxu, are you using "windows" to test your "access" results?

I ask because the following screen shot looks like windows to me. if you are using windows for access, it could be a redirect virus of some sort.

Hi,Rudge
Yes,it is a snapshot in winXP.I am using pclinuxos under virtualbox,but the result is the same.
I am sure it is not a virus on my computer,and as I aforementioned,I have done some tests in
other places with different computers,the conclusion is the same!By the way,this phenomenon has
lasted for several serval months at least!^=^

[djohnston]

According to his tracert screen capture from Windows, he is reaching Atlanta, GA on the last two hops. That's where it's timing out.

border1.t7-1-bbnet1.sje.pnap.net
enkillc-1.border1.sje.pnap.net

PnAp.net is registered to:
Internap Network Services
   250 Williams St
   Suite E-100
   Atlanta, GA 30303
   US

[Rudge]

julianxu, are you using "windows" to test your "access" results?

I ask because the following screen shot looks like windows to me. if you are using windows for access, it could be a redirect virus of some sort.

Hi,Rudge
Yes,it is a snapshot in winXP.I am using pclinuxos under virtualbox,but the result is the same.
I am sure it is not a virus on my computer,and as I aforementioned,I have done some tests in
other places with different computers,the conclusion is the same!By the way,this phenomenon has
lasted for several serval months at least!^=^

Different computers in different places with different Operating Systems.. same results.

So it can't be the computer, and It can't be the router, and it can't be the OS.

How many things are left?

[julianxu]

I do not whether it is help,because the whole page is too long to contain in one snapshot,so this is the upper part of the page : http://postimage.org/image/lrxlxn4hr/

now I have a snapshot of the other part :http://postimage.org/image/6mo6e9t33/,and it is interesting in the note part as : http://postimage.org/image/6mo6e9t33/

Code: [Select]

Note:

CentOS is an Operating System and it is used to power this website; however, the webserver is owned by the domain owner and not the CentOS Project. If you have issues with the content of this site, contact the owner of the domain, not the CentOS project.

Unless this server is on the CentOS.org domain, the CentOS Project doesn't have anything to do with the content on this webserver or any e-mails that directed you to this site.

For example, if this website is [url=http://www.example.com]www.example.com[/url], you would find the owner of the example.com domain at the following WHOIS server:

http://www.internic.net/whois.html

Is it a clue?

[Rudge]

According to his tracert screen capture from Windows, he is reaching Atlanta, GA on the last two hops. That's where it's timing out.

border1.t7-1-bbnet1.sje.pnap.net
enkillc-1.border1.sje.pnap.net

PnAp.net is registered to:
Internap Network Services
   250 Williams St
   Suite E-100
   Atlanta, GA 30303
   US

It should not matter. The host that he is looking for should respond in whatever way it can. If he reached Atlanta, and then stopped, doesn't  that only mean that the "host" was at some time, in the Atlanta "hosts.conf" file and still is there for some reason?

This is all a bit over my head.  

[julianxu]

As Old-Polack sending a message to ask my IP Address,If it is help,I check it out under winXP with
ipconfig command,it shows my IP is :114.250.126.175 ,
snapshot is : http://postimage.org/image/tcnb79can/

and O-P said:

That IP is registered to Delco Electronics Corporation, Kokomo Indiana, USA. I doubt that is your IP address from your ISP in China.

So is there a mistake I do?

[djohnston]

It should not matter. The host that he is looking for should respond in whatever way it can. If he reached Atlanta, and then stopped, doesn't  that only mean that the "host" was at some time, in the Atlanta "hosts.conf" file and still is there for some reason?

From reading through his posts, he is running PCLinuxOS in VirtualBox on a Windows host. His traceroute on PCLinuxOS goes nowhere. In other words, it doesn't even make the first hop.

In Windows, the hops (connections from one internet router or gateway to another) are leaving China. His traffic makes it as far as Internap's enkillc-1.border1.sje.pnap.net router. Passing the traffic to the next step towards eventually reaching pclinuxos.com is failing at that point. I have seen this before when trying to reach certain websites. srlinuxx used to have many problems with her service provider hosting tuxmachines.org. One of those problems was a certain IP address block of routers that would time out consistently. I don't know if it was due to DNS cache poisoning, hardware problems or something else.

I haven't seen what DNS lookup the OP is using, whether it be Google's at 8.8.8.8 or OpenDNS at 208.67.222.222 or ... something else? However, changing DNS lookup may or may not help with the physical internet traffic routing from poin A to point B. Capiche?

[julianxu]

According to his tracert screen capture from Windows, he is reaching Atlanta, GA on the last two hops. That's where it's timing out.

border1.t7-1-bbnet1.sje.pnap.net
enkillc-1.border1.sje.pnap.net

PnAp.net is registered to:
Internap Network Services
   250 Williams St
   Suite E-100
   Atlanta, GA 30303
   US

I have sent two results of using tracert command:
1)
http://postimage.org/image/kk1amgku7/
2)
http://postimage.org/image/9kl57z0qn/

I noticed that there is a "Request time out" in 13th hop of two tests,and I had asked AS it is nomal,and got answer "no, nothing wrong other that has not answered within 5 secs ...".I have no idea of this knowledge,so what is your conclusion,Pal?

[djohnston]

I have sent two results of using tracert command:
1)
http://postimage.org/image/kk1amgku7/
2)
http://postimage.org/image/9kl57z0qn/

I noticed that there is a "Request time out" in 13th hop of two tests,and I had asked AS it is nomal,and got answer "no, nothing wrong other that has not answered within 5 secs ...".I have no idea of this knowledge,so what is your conclusion,Pal?

Both #1 and #2 reached 199.231.58.82 which is pclinuxos.com. One of your earlier screenshots (which I misquoted) did not.

Two things about your Windows ipconfig.

1) If your VirtualBox IP address actually is 192.168.1.77, then the VirtualBox Gateway setting is wrong. It currently is 192.169.1.1, but should be 192.168.1.1.

2) If you are going through a proxy, then it makes sense that both your PPP IP address and Gateway address are the same (114.250.126.175).

[julianxu]

It should not matter. The host that he is looking for should respond in whatever way it can. If he reached Atlanta, and then stopped, doesn't  that only mean that the "host" was at some time, in the Atlanta "hosts.conf" file and still is there for some reason?

From reading through his posts, he is running PCLinuxOS in VirtualBox on a Windows host. His traceroute on PCLinuxOS goes nowhere. In other words, it doesn't even make the first hop.

In Windows, the hops (connections from one internet router or gateway to another) are leaving China. His traffic makes it as far as Internap's enkillc-1.border1.sje.pnap.net router. Passing the traffic to the next step towards eventually reaching pclinuxos.com is failing at that point. I have seen this before when trying to reach certain websites. srlinuxx used to have many problems with her service provider hosting tuxmachines.org. One of those problems was a certain IP address block of routers that would time out consistently. I don't know if it was due to DNS cache poisoning, hardware problems or something else.

I haven't seen what DNS lookup the OP is using, whether it be Google's at 8.8.8.8 or OpenDNS at 208.67.222.222 or ... something else? However, changing DNS lookup may or may not help with the physical internet traffic routing from poin A to point B. Capiche?

Before I posted this thread,I have done a tinker of changing my DNS server to Google's at 8.8.8.8 or at 8.8.8.4 under winXP,but the result is the same,is this help?

and I can use internet nomally under pclinuxos,I can update my system or install software under pclinuxos,but ping ,traceroute and xtraceroute can not work,I have no idea of this,and I think this is another issue about virtualbox,right?Thanks for your reply,friend!  

[djohnston]

and I can use internet nomally under pclinuxos,I can update my system or install software under pclinuxos,but ping ,traceroute and xtraceroute can not work,I have no idea of this,and I think this is another issue about virtualbox,right?Thanks for your reply,friend!  

Please see reply # 69.

[julianxu]

Two things about your Windows ipconfig.

1) If your VirtualBox IP address actually is 192.168.1.77, then the VirtualBox Gateway setting is wrong. It currently is 192.169.1.1, but should be 192.168.1.1.

2) If you are going through a proxy, then it makes sense that both your PPP IP address and Gateway address are the same (114.250.126.175).

1)You are right,it is a mistype yesterday before I went to bed.originally,I do some settings with my NIC
to visit 192.168.1.1 in order to do my ADSL modem setting,nothing important! and then I wanted to undo
these changes,but I did a mistake with the virtualbox's NIC,and I do not know how it is set before,so I tinkered it as above shown.but it is important that all test results are made BEFORE this accident.

2)The proxy I used is an online proxy,You could try it:  http://polysolve.com/
    As an online proxy,I need not do tinker with my computer to use it,so the IP address is my real IP.
   At least,I think so,is it right pal?

[julianxu]

Another snapshot to show my IP,I check it out through google:

http://postimage.org/image/qju3n8by7/

and O-P told me I have done a mistype with IP info I send to him,sweating!!! So I apologize for that.
He told me some infomations as :

The corrected number from your last message belongs to:

4808 CHINA169-BJ CNCGROUP IP network China169 Beijing Province Network

which is much more believable.  Grin

I've checked all of the possible ban triggers that might affect that IP address, in relation to PCLinuxOS and this forum, and there are none. There is nothing in the forum configuration or any existing bans against known spammers that would affect your real IP address, or prevent it from being used to access the forum. Whatever the problem, it does not originate here.

We have had a very large problem with spammers from China over the last two years, and very few legitimate Chinese users. Sometimes a legitimate user gets caught in one of the spammer bans, so we have to make special rules to allow them access while keeping the known spammers out, which is why I needed your correct IP address to check this very thoroughly.

I hope you can get this resolved so you can enjoy full use of the forum and all its functions, without the need for a proxy server, or its limitations.

So it is not a mistake from sever setting.Thank you for your help,O-P,you are so kind!

[djohnston]

2)The proxy I used is an online proxy,You could try it:  http://polysolve.com/
    As an online proxy,I need not do tinker with my computer to use it,so the IP address is my real IP.
   At least,I think so,is it right pal?

Yes, you are correct. Your actual IP is :114.250.126.175. According to APNIC's whois database, the address block 114.240.0.0 - 114.255.255.255 belongs to China Unicom Beijing province network.

Sorry to run off, but it's way past my bed time.