Please test: pkgutils-0.1.5-4

[KernelKarter]

- Fixed right-click menu in Dolphin and Thunar
- Fixed addpkg

SRPM is here: http://db.tt/UHVWEMd4

Please test, thanks.

-- Eddie

[Neal ManBear]

No time to test just now. Happens that way sometimes. Soon, though, I hope.     

[KernelKarter]

Yes, I know it is and I actually grabbed it and built it successfully without any modifications on my 32-bit build system a couple of days ago. Why is 1.6.1 not in the 32-bit repos and, furthermore, I've just discovered that 0.1.5-4 has been in "testing" since last July. Looks like I've re-invented the wheel 

-- Eddie

[Neal ManBear]

You built 1.6.1 for 32bit a couple of days ago? Where's the SRPM?     

[Archie]

On top of this, I know travsiN000 is working on an improvement on the mkrepo-GUI script based on yad. Just an FYI.

[travisN000]

On top of this, I know travsiN000 is working on an improvement on the mkrepo-GUI script based on yad. Just an FYI.

...the home PC i use for these projects is boxed up in my garage at the moment because of some home improvement projects..  It may be awhile before I get back to any of the projects i had going;  I thought the mkrepo-GUI changes were uploaded at the same time as it was made 32/64 bit compatable, so this should already be in...  ..but I cannot verify.  

   

[Archie]

Heya Travis,

I remembered that your latest script allows packagers to define the src/ (other than the default /home) but I also could not verify the latest since I already got my src/ the way I wanted and it was just a simple case of copying my previous .rpmmacros and .rpmrc to the new /home.

Home improvement? Definitely priority project. We're all good here with pkgutils.

[KernelKarter]

You built 1.6.1 for 32bit a couple of days ago? Where's the SRPM?     

Assuming we're talking about 0.1.6-1, no, I didn't build it for 32-bit, I grabbed the SRPM from the 64-bit repo and built it on my 32-bit build system. Just to make absolutely certain that I didn't make any modifications, I've just built it again on a clean 32-bit build system. It built without problems and I ended up with this:

Code: [Select]

[kernelkarter@localhost ~]$ ls -l /home/kernelkarter/src/rpm/SRPMS
total 24
-rw-r--r-- 1 kernelkarter kernelkarter 22322 Feb 16 12:51 pkgutils-0.1.6-1KernelKarter2012.src.rpm
[kernelkarter@localhost ~]$

And these:

Code: [Select]

[kernelkarter@localhost ~]$ ls -l /home/kernelkarter/src/rpm/RPMS/noarch
total 40
-rw-r--r-- 1 kernelkarter kernelkarter 14635 Feb 16 12:51 pkgutils-0.1.6-1KernelKarter2012.noarch.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 kernelkarter kernelkarter  9601 Feb 16 12:51 pkgutils-kde4-0.1.6-1KernelKarter2012.noarch.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 kernelkarter kernelkarter  8345 Feb 16 12:51 pkgutils-thunar-0.1.6-1KernelKarter2012.noarch.rpm
[kernelkarter@localhost ~]$

I then installed the above three packages on a clean 32-bit test system and built a test package without any problems. As the RPM's are noarch, I'll ask you the same question I asked @Sproggy: Why is 1.6.1 not in the 32-bit repos.

-- Eddie

[Neal ManBear]

You ask, so I will ask the question again, where is your 32bit pkgutils src.rpm?     

[KernelKarter]

* Edit: Link removed, SRPM now out of date.

-- Eddie

[Neal ManBear]

Got it.     

[Neal ManBear]

Eddie,     
You must add to %changelog before you build. Never build an RPM without creating an entry here. Do not change the name of the spec file, unless it is to add the prefix "pclos-."     

[KernelKarter]

Please bear in mind that I'm a n00b where packaging is concerned and, as far as this particular project is concerned, I'm becoming more and more puzzled 

I didn't put anything in the %changelog simply because I haven't changed anything. I've already explained in a previous post exactly what I've done but perhaps I should have put something like "Initial build for 32-bit PCLOS 2012.02" in the %changelog.

Where the name of the SPEC file is concerned, I don't know if you're implying that I've changed it but I can assure you that I haven't.

When I receive your reply, I'll make any necessary changes and then post a link to the new SRPM.

-- Eddie

[Neal ManBear]

Eddie,     
Not meaning to confuse you.     
Any time you build/rebuild an RPM, you must add an entry in %changelog. Start with the day and date. That is likely to be new, if nothing else.     

"- 32bit build" would be fine.     

From the last time I looked at this package, the spec has been renamed from "pclos-pkutils.spec" to "pclos-pkutils-all.spec." That change was not necessary.     

[KernelKarter]

Eddie,     
Not meaning to confuse you.

That's easily done these days 

     
Any time you build/rebuild an RPM, you must add an entry in %changelog. Start with the day and date. That is likely to be new, if nothing else.     

OK 

"- 32bit build" would be fine.     

OK, I'll add something like that.

From the last time I looked at this package, the spec has been renamed from "pclos-pkutils.spec" to "pclos-pkutils-all.spec." That change was not necessary.     

Well, someone else must have changed it before I got my grubby mits on it. Should I change it back to "pclos-pkgutils.spec"?

-- Eddie