Hi,
This is a portable USB drive connected to my netbook, but the same info should
be shown on a desktop, so I'll ask this question here.
Disk /dev/sdc: 250.1 GB, 250059350016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders, total 488397168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x56bf230f
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdc1 * 63 42989939 21494938+ 83 Linux
/dev/sdc2 42989940 53753489 5381775 83 Linux
/dev/sdc3 53753490 215013959 80630235 5 Extended
/dev/sdc4 215013960 488392064 136689052+ 7 HPFS/NTFS
/dev/sdc5 53753553 107506979 26876713+ 83 Linux
/dev/sdc6 107507043 161244404 26868681 83 Linux
/dev/sdc7 161244468 215013959 26884746 83 Linux
The above code is from fdisk -l
Rarely use fdisk to change partition order but today I did.
The /dev/sdc3 listed extended partition doesn't exist as a working
partition and testdisk has an message regarding this also.
/dev/sdc1 and sdc2 and sdc4 are primary and the others
are logical. Should /dev/sdc3 be listed at all ? Haven't
noticed this type of listing before. The partitions still aren't
listed in exact order as on the hard drive but are listed better
than before. /dev/sdc4 the third primary partition should
be listed last and /dev/sdc3 shouldn't be listed at all as it really isn't
there except as the extended partition for the others.
It's probably OK and listed as best as fdisk can relist them
and is working OK. Before I put this project to rest I wanted
to ask.
Any ideas bad or otherwise ?
THX.
FF