|
Maurice
|
 |
« on: March 03, 2011, 07:49:41 PM » |
|
I have Pclos dual booting with XP plus I also have Windows XP as a guest in Pclos.
As a guest, is it as vulnerable to malware as the normally installed XP is or is it somehow 'protected' by being in a virtual box?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
PcLinuxos 2012.02, Kde 4.6.3, dual booting with Windows XP on custom built Desktop, Intel 06600 Quad core. DG33FB mb, 4gb ram, Nvidia 8600 (512mb), Samsung (500gb) sata hdd
|
|
|
|
AndrzejL
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2011, 07:58:54 PM » |
|
Vulnerable if connected to internet... VBox is not a "sandboxing" tool.
Regards.
Andy
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
T6
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: March 03, 2011, 08:07:30 PM » |
|
you need to put antivirus, enable firewall and don't open suspicious files
a virtual machines is just a machine with limited access to your real hardware, nothing special can be added to make it more secure without risking the stability
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open your brains fall out."
Carl Sagan
|
|
|
|
parnote
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: March 03, 2011, 08:12:32 PM » |
|
Agree with T6 and AndrzejL.
Win-anything isn't secure, even if ran in a virtual machine. You will still need to run anti-virus, anti-malware and anti-spyware software, if you want Win-anything to remain secure. However, if your virtual box copy becomes corrupted by any of the aforementioned plagues, you can either just reinstall, or even better yet, restore it from a pristine copy of your virtual machine (provided you kept a backup of your VirtualBox VDI file). Furthermore, any mal-anything that Windows-anything picks up should stay isolated to only that virtual machine, and should not have any ill effects on your host.
parnote
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ElCuervo
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: March 03, 2011, 09:00:46 PM » |
|
I would say it depends on you. If you don't surf porn and other stupid websites, it's relatively safe. I have had WinXP running for over two years as an unprotected guest, and not once has anything bad happened. However, I don't do any web surfing on Windows - but then why would I? It's a simple mouse click to Firefox in Linux!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Maurice
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: March 03, 2011, 09:10:15 PM » |
|
Thanks for those very prompt replies chaps. So now I know. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
PcLinuxos 2012.02, Kde 4.6.3, dual booting with Windows XP on custom built Desktop, Intel 06600 Quad core. DG33FB mb, 4gb ram, Nvidia 8600 (512mb), Samsung (500gb) sata hdd
|
|
|
cphayes0882
Jr. Member

Offline
Posts: 16
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: March 03, 2011, 09:16:28 PM » |
|
Exactly, no porn and XP will run perfect forever....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
T6
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: March 03, 2011, 09:17:18 PM » |
|
no porn?
terrible...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open your brains fall out."
Carl Sagan
|
|
|
|
|
|
T6
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: March 03, 2011, 09:29:08 PM » |
|
yes but why bother?
i prefer to use pclinux, no snapshots required, not much to worry here
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open your brains fall out."
Carl Sagan
|
|
|
Archie
Global Moderator
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 6885
I will never forget you, uhhh...
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: March 03, 2011, 10:18:25 PM » |
|
Then if it is easy to revert to a healthy XP install after infections, one does not have to install anti-virus software and can surf all the porn site they want ... done in virtual state.
It would be wise not to enable Shared Folder, especially if they have read/write access to any of your Linux folders.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Maurice
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: March 03, 2011, 10:42:46 PM » |
|
There's an interesting article on this at dedoimedo.comYou do not need anti-virus software. You do not need it in Windows, nor Linux. Blacklisting is an obsolete method of maintaining security of your operating system.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
PcLinuxos 2012.02, Kde 4.6.3, dual booting with Windows XP on custom built Desktop, Intel 06600 Quad core. DG33FB mb, 4gb ram, Nvidia 8600 (512mb), Samsung (500gb) sata hdd
|
|
|
Archie
Global Moderator
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 6885
I will never forget you, uhhh...
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: March 03, 2011, 10:48:34 PM » |
|
Just an after thought... how much approximately would a CPU+RAM be using when running an anti-virus program both in the background and a manual scan?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Crow
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: March 04, 2011, 12:21:46 AM » |
|
Do you want a light Anti Virus that does just what the others do and it's free? I just downloaded Placebo AV Check it if you want http://www.doxdesk.com/updates/2008.html#u20080129-placeboI have it now in my taskbar and I'm sending it to all my friends 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Linux User #330412 PCLinuxOS e17 Club Member
When life hands you lemons... add a little salt and Tequila
|
|
|
Archie
Global Moderator
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 6885
I will never forget you, uhhh...
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: March 04, 2011, 01:16:46 AM » |
|
Gotta love that fanfare ... Until then... That'll scare all potential infections. Nothing to see, please proceed. And the Plus Pro is a steal for $30! Now, where did I put that rope? 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|