PCLinuxOS-Forums
News: ...FLASH!!! ...New PCLinuxOS Testing board now open. Register today! Be an active contributor to the PCLinuxOS future! ... Read all about it now, on THIS forum!!!..
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. May 26, 2012, 04:12:29 PM


Login with username, password and session length


Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: vdi files  (Read 1536 times)
bicol_willem
PCLinuxOS Tester
Hero Member
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1763


« on: May 28, 2010, 08:33:32 AM »

I am a bit at lost at the moment and hope someone can set me on the rails again.
I used to simply copy a OS (.vdi file) installed in Virtualbox. That was nice for to be used to quickly run it again in i.e. a new install (testing etc.) and as backup of the same.
However, these OS's did meanwhile grow and so did the vdi file representing it.
Now I can't copy these things anymore for it simply stops at 4GB ......
I know (or better knew somewhere in the past) the "missing link" but right now I am at lost.  Huh
Anyone?
Logged

menotu
PCLinuxOS Tester
Super Villain
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11986

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐


« Reply #1 on: May 28, 2010, 08:47:19 AM »

Hi bicol_willem ,

Couple of things to ask:

When you created your VDI hard disks can you remember whether you used "Dynamically expanding Storage" or "Fixed Size Storage" ?

And can you remember what size you allocated to them ?

Edit: I just found this which may help.

http://www.attackr.com/resize-an-existing-vdi-virtualbox-image-easily/
Logged

If you can keep you head while all around you are losing theirs, then you have misunderstood the situation.

PCLinuxOS 32bit & 64bit; 3.2.17bfs kernel, KDE 4.8.3; nvidia 295.53, Athlon 64 X2 4200+; 4GB Ram; NVidia GeForce 8400GS 1GB; x.org 1.10.4 ; 500GB/320GB
pags
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1951


Keep it clean.


« Reply #2 on: May 28, 2010, 08:57:34 AM »

What method are you using to copy the files?

Have you tried using VBoxManage?

Some benefits include re-organizing the .vdi drive data (especially if you zero-out and de-frag in the Virtual OS, prior), resulting in a smaller file, and creating a new UID (which would actually allow you to use the two .vdi's in seperate virtual machines concurrently on the same host).

The command format is:
Code:
VBoxManage clonehd /full/path/to/original/vdi/file /full/path/to/copy/of/vdi/file_new_name
Logged
bicol_willem
PCLinuxOS Tester
Hero Member
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1763


« Reply #3 on: May 28, 2010, 09:00:51 AM »

Hi bicol_willem ,

Couple of things to ask:

When you created your VDI hard disks can you remember whether you used "Dynamically expanding Storage" or "Fixed Size Storage" ?

And can you remember what size you allocated to them ?

Yes, dynamically expanding and about 12Gb max. The vdi's in question shows in their properties at a size of resp. 5.0 and 5.6 Gb. Nothing really special imho.
It wasn't any of a problem at the times these where less then 4 Gb. It now copies to exact 4 Gb and then fail to copy .... I tried to copy these to a external USB (hard)drive as I actually use to do.
Memory? Swap? Where is the missing link?  Huh
This machine has 3Gig's RAM and 4 Gig's Swap. Not enough?
Tried as user(s) and root as well, no go.
Tried to burn them to a dual layer DVD, no go as well.
System fully updated and running fine.
Any idea?
Logged

bicol_willem
PCLinuxOS Tester
Hero Member
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1763


« Reply #4 on: May 28, 2010, 09:03:35 AM »

What method are you using to copy the files?

Have you tried using VBoxManage?

Some benefits include re-organizing the .vdi drive data (especially if you zero-out and de-frag in the Virtual OS, prior), resulting in a smaller file, and creating a new UID (which would actually allow you to use the two .vdi's in seperate virtual machines concurrently on the same host).

The command format is:
Code:
VBoxManage clonehd /full/path/to/original/vdi/file /full/path/to/copy/of/vdi/file_new_name


No, didn't use VBoxManage. You see, I never needed it ....  Grin (so far that is). But if nothing comes around I will sure give that a swirl, thanks for this tip.
Logged

pags
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1951


Keep it clean.


« Reply #5 on: May 28, 2010, 09:11:57 AM »

What method are you using to copy the files?

Have you tried using VBoxManage?

Some benefits include re-organizing the .vdi drive data (especially if you zero-out and de-frag in the Virtual OS, prior), resulting in a smaller file, and creating a new UID (which would actually allow you to use the two .vdi's in seperate virtual machines concurrently on the same host).

The command format is:
Code:
VBoxManage clonehd /full/path/to/original/vdi/file /full/path/to/copy/of/vdi/file_new_name


No, didn't use VBoxManage. You see, I never needed it ....  Grin (so far that is). But if nothing comes around I will sure give that a swirl, thanks for this tip.

I've used this to copy file in excess of 4GB.  My laptop only has 2 GB mem and 3 GB swap (although it had 4 GB swap when I did the copies).  I use the program as my regular (non-root) user, since I own all the VM files  Wink
Logged
menotu
PCLinuxOS Tester
Super Villain
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11986

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐


« Reply #6 on: May 28, 2010, 09:12:42 AM »

Quote
It now copies to exact 4 Gb and then fail to copy .... I tried to copy these to a external USB (hard)drive as I actually use to do.

What file format is on the drive your copying to?
Logged

If you can keep you head while all around you are losing theirs, then you have misunderstood the situation.

PCLinuxOS 32bit & 64bit; 3.2.17bfs kernel, KDE 4.8.3; nvidia 295.53, Athlon 64 X2 4200+; 4GB Ram; NVidia GeForce 8400GS 1GB; x.org 1.10.4 ; 500GB/320GB
bicol_willem
PCLinuxOS Tester
Hero Member
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1763


« Reply #7 on: May 28, 2010, 09:18:24 AM »

Quote
It now copies to exact 4 Gb and then fail to copy .... I tried to copy these to a external USB (hard)drive as I actually use to do.

What file format is on the drive your copying to?

To have my external drive as much compatible with it all out there, I use there FAT32 (Not sure if I always did so).
The crazy thing is that I faced the same kind of problem in the past, overcame it somehow and .... forgot how! Rather annoying  Roll Eyes
Logged

Was_Just19
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6885


MLU


« Reply #8 on: May 28, 2010, 09:26:50 AM »

Quote
It now copies to exact 4 Gb and then fail to copy .... I tried to copy these to a external USB (hard)drive as I actually use to do.

What file format is on the drive your copying to?

To have my external drive as much compatible with it all out there, I use there FAT32 (Not sure if I always did so).
The crazy thing is that I faced the same kind of problem in the past, overcame it somehow and .... forgot how! Rather annoying  Roll Eyes

FAT 32 has a file size limit of 4GB
You want something bigger use a better filesystem.   Wink
Logged
pags
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1951


Keep it clean.


« Reply #9 on: May 28, 2010, 09:36:27 AM »

Quote
It now copies to exact 4 Gb and then fail to copy .... I tried to copy these to a external USB (hard)drive as I actually use to do.

What file format is on the drive your copying to?

To have my external drive as much compatible with it all out there, I use there FAT32 (Not sure if I always did so).
The crazy thing is that I faced the same kind of problem in the past, overcame it somehow and .... forgot how! Rather annoying  Roll Eyes

FAT 32 has a file size limit of 4GB
You want something bigger use a better filesystem.   Wink

Yep.  That's it, exactly!

FAT32 is only required if you'll being using the drive with W9x, etc.  If you need to share the drive with Windows XP (or, 2000, or Vista, or 7...), try formatting it as NTFS.  Using the ntfs-3g software under PCLOS, you'll be able to write to it.
If you use the drive under Linux only, you should consider ext3.  I get great performance from external USB HDDs w/ ext3 (apparently, ext4 can be problematic with external drives...no experience there, myself)
Logged
bicol_willem
PCLinuxOS Tester
Hero Member
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1763


« Reply #10 on: May 28, 2010, 09:39:27 AM »

So in short, you suggest to reformat the external drive to i.e. NTFS or EXT3 and simply try again?
Logged

pags
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1951


Keep it clean.


« Reply #11 on: May 28, 2010, 10:08:10 AM »

So in short, you suggest to reformat the external drive to i.e. NTFS or EXT3 and simply try again?

Yes.
As long as you don't lose any data on it!  Wink  Backup what's on it, if it's important to you...

If you're going to go the NTFS route (which presumes you have access to hardware running Windows), I personally would format the drive on Windows.
If EXT3, then obviously...Windows doesn't come into consideration at all  Grin
Logged
bicol_willem
PCLinuxOS Tester
Hero Member
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1763


« Reply #12 on: May 28, 2010, 10:15:13 AM »

Yeah right ... well, Windows is "out of reach" for now. Guess I will have to try Pmagic to get NTFS on it .... I would prefer EXT3 but as I said earlier, sometimes I got to share things, even with Windows fan's  Shocked
Thanks for all the suggestions, will post later (Tomorrow, it's late here now) in how far this is/was the solution.
Logged

pags
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1951


Keep it clean.


« Reply #13 on: May 28, 2010, 10:39:12 AM »

Yeah right ... well, Windows is "out of reach" for now. Guess I will have to try Pmagic to get NTFS on it .... I would prefer EXT3 but as I said earlier, sometimes I got to share things, even with Windows fan's  Shocked
Thanks for all the suggestions, will post later (Tomorrow, it's late here now) in how far this is/was the solution.

There is software for Windows that will allow it to access an ext3 filesystem (not sure what it is ... Google should help).

As such, a possible approach (and if you don't care to go down this road, that is, of course, fine!) would be to re-partiton the drive with a small (relative, depending on the total size of the drive ... 1 GB, perhaps, for >20GB ... 1/2 GB for <20GB?) FAT partition.  The balance could then be one big ext3 filesystem.
The ext3 Windows software could be stored on the FAT partition, and then used on any Windows machine that may need to access the larger partition.

In reality, the single NTFS approach is simpler.  I just trust ext3 more  Wink.
Logged
menotu
PCLinuxOS Tester
Super Villain
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11986

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐


« Reply #14 on: May 28, 2010, 11:38:11 AM »

Quote
There is software for Windows that will allow it to access an ext3 filesystem (not sure what it is ... Google should help).


Is this it Pags ?

http://www.diskinternals.com/linux-reader/
Logged

If you can keep you head while all around you are losing theirs, then you have misunderstood the situation.

PCLinuxOS 32bit & 64bit; 3.2.17bfs kernel, KDE 4.8.3; nvidia 295.53, Athlon 64 X2 4200+; 4GB Ram; NVidia GeForce 8400GS 1GB; x.org 1.10.4 ; 500GB/320GB
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM