PCLinuxOS-Forums
News: ...FLASH!!! ...New PCLinuxOS Testing board now open. Register today! Be an active contributor to the PCLinuxOS future! ... Read all about it now, on THIS forum!!!..
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. May 26, 2012, 03:31:45 PM


Login with username, password and session length


Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Install won't find hard drives  (Read 4116 times)
craesz
PCLinuxOS Tester
Hero Member
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 770



« Reply #45 on: May 27, 2010, 04:34:30 PM »

other screen
Logged

Desktop1: AMD64 8450 [3 core]; 8GB; 2.6.38.8-pclos3.pae; KDE
Desktop2: AMD64 5400 [8 core]; 16GB; 3.2.16-a64; KDE
Netbook: EeePC 901; Atom N270; 1GB; 2.6.33.7-pclos6.bfs; KDE

Old-Polack
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9694


----IOFLU----


« Reply #46 on: May 27, 2010, 04:55:39 PM »

I'm running from that livecd right now.... thought about the PCC hardware listing.... I'm attaching those screens. The livecd finds the controller.... do I need to modify some of the settings? Why does it say IDE under the SATA controller? Maybe some setting on the drives (but then why does my prior install find them?)?


I see two possibilities, bad burn or bad read. If the burn checks out, the read lens may be dirty or misaligned. I'd go with dirty first.

Have you tried the disk in any other computer?

My last motherboard, had to have RAID turned on, AHCI turned on, then JBOD selected, in order to see individual SATA disks. I would suspect the BIOS settings, except the other installation is working with the current BIOS settings. This is why I'm thinking dirty lens or dying optical drive, if the disk itself checks out. I've personally never seen a properly burned disk have fdisk -l fail to see the drive partition tables when the proper modules are loaded. and they do seem to be loading in your tests.  Huh
Logged

Old-Polack

Of what use be there for joy, if not for the sharing thereof?



Lest we forget...
Was_Just19
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6885


MLU


« Reply #47 on: May 27, 2010, 05:26:41 PM »

I would change the (AHCI?) setting in BIOS and then see if it uses the sata_nv module, which I believe is the correct one for that board.
Logged
Old-Polack
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9694


----IOFLU----


« Reply #48 on: May 27, 2010, 05:52:18 PM »

I would change the (AHCI?) setting in BIOS and then see if it uses the sata_nv module, which I believe is the correct one for that board.

Reply #40 seems to do that.
Logged

Old-Polack

Of what use be there for joy, if not for the sharing thereof?



Lest we forget...
Was_Just19
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6885


MLU


« Reply #49 on: May 27, 2010, 06:05:23 PM »

I would change the (AHCI?) setting in BIOS and then see if it uses the sata_nv module, which I believe is the correct one for that board.

Reply #40 seems to do that.

Yes for the module .....  not sure now about the BIOS settings though ....
Logged
craesz
PCLinuxOS Tester
Hero Member
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 770



« Reply #50 on: May 27, 2010, 08:28:51 PM »

I would change the (AHCI?) setting in BIOS and then see if it uses the sata_nv module, which I believe is the correct one for that board.
Change to AHCI or to SATA?Huh??
Logged

Desktop1: AMD64 8450 [3 core]; 8GB; 2.6.38.8-pclos3.pae; KDE
Desktop2: AMD64 5400 [8 core]; 16GB; 3.2.16-a64; KDE
Netbook: EeePC 901; Atom N270; 1GB; 2.6.33.7-pclos6.bfs; KDE

craesz
PCLinuxOS Tester
Hero Member
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 770



« Reply #51 on: May 27, 2010, 08:30:28 PM »

I see two possibilities, bad burn or bad read. If the burn checks out, the read lens may be dirty or misaligned. I'd go with dirty first.

Have you tried the disk in any other computer?

My last motherboard, had to have RAID turned on, AHCI turned on, then JBOD selected, in order to see individual SATA disks. I would suspect the BIOS settings, except the other installation is working with the current BIOS settings. This is why I'm thinking dirty lens or dying optical drive, if the disk itself checks out. I've personally never seen a properly burned disk have fdisk -l fail to see the drive partition tables when the proper modules are loaded. and they do seem to be loading in your tests.  Huh

Tried booting from other CD drive in the same computer.... no go... same result. Just booted with the CD here at the house. No problems with the livecd seeing drives..... This is getting frustrating.
Logged

Desktop1: AMD64 8450 [3 core]; 8GB; 2.6.38.8-pclos3.pae; KDE
Desktop2: AMD64 5400 [8 core]; 16GB; 3.2.16-a64; KDE
Netbook: EeePC 901; Atom N270; 1GB; 2.6.33.7-pclos6.bfs; KDE

vc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 523


« Reply #52 on: August 12, 2010, 05:44:18 PM »

Having a somewhat similar problem, I used modprobe to load the pata_amd and amd74xx modules, when my IDE drives weren't seen. Next fdisk -l command they were then present. The problem seems to be between hardware detection and choosing which controller modules to load. When the correct modules are loaded, the drives can be seen.


Interesting.  I've also encountered this problem recently, with four SATA drives attached to an Asus A8V-MX motherboard; performing the usual due diligence of a forum search lead me to this thread, where I've accordingly endeavoured to follow your advice above.  I found basically similar results; live CD boots successfully but the SATA drives are not 'seen' - however, none of the modprobe efforts were successful at all... modprobe -l | grep sata did return a list of SATA modules, yet inserting each in turn failed to produce any fdisk -l detection results.,

The reason I am posting in this thread now is because today I stumbled upon a possible solution:

http://mylinuxramblings.wordpress.com/2010/02/04/linux-hell-via-southbridge-vt8251-sata-ii-controller/

Rebooting, and passing the "pci=nomsi" boot parameter to the kernel via GRUB did produce immediate results - all four SATA drives were then detected, and I was able to partition and format them successfully.  As they seem to be alright now, I shall next attempt to continue with the install.

Regards, and good luck to all with motherboards having VT8251 southbridge chips!
Logged
craesz
PCLinuxOS Tester
Hero Member
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 770



« Reply #53 on: August 12, 2010, 06:40:41 PM »

Wish I had known this before I bought the new motherboard.....
Logged

Desktop1: AMD64 8450 [3 core]; 8GB; 2.6.38.8-pclos3.pae; KDE
Desktop2: AMD64 5400 [8 core]; 16GB; 3.2.16-a64; KDE
Netbook: EeePC 901; Atom N270; 1GB; 2.6.33.7-pclos6.bfs; KDE

vc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 523


« Reply #54 on: August 12, 2010, 08:55:28 PM »

Wish I had known this before I bought the new motherboard.....

Yes... sorry about that; however, I've only encountered this now and was very lucky indeed to have actually found a functional workaround... or at least one that seems to be functioning so far (the system is updating from the heanet repo as I type this.).

If you have kept your previous motherboard, perhaps it may yet be of some use...?
Logged
Was_Just19
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6885


MLU


« Reply #55 on: August 13, 2010, 02:57:53 AM »

There is some interesting information supplied in this thread .....

http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=120710

It does deal with older kernels but the info is interesting none the less.
Logged
djohnston
PCLinuxOS Tester
Hero Member
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5702


I don't do Windows


« Reply #56 on: August 13, 2010, 01:41:52 PM »

Thanks, JohnBoy. I didn't realize MSI had been around that long. I first ran into it on one of the PCs I bought from LinPC. I got lucky in configuring the BIOS, I guess.
Logged

Bare metal                           VBox
AMD Athlon 7750 Dual-Core    Single core
4GiB RAM                              1GiB RAM
nVidia GeForce FX 5200          64MB video
LXDE 32bit                            KDE 64bit

Registered Linux User #416378
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM