PCLinuxOS-Forums
News: ...FLASH!!! ...New PCLinuxOS Testing board now open. Register today! Be an active contributor to the PCLinuxOS future! ... Read all about it now, on THIS forum!!!..
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. May 26, 2012, 10:11:11 AM


Login with username, password and session length


Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: April 13 vs. April 15 release  (Read 717 times)
boehmb
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 25


« on: April 18, 2010, 10:37:31 AM »

Are there any significant differences between the April 13th (695MB) release and the April 15th (694MB) release?  I installed the April 13th version and it is working perfectly.  Synaptic has been doing updates with no problems.
Logged
pinoc
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 2132



WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2010, 10:41:19 AM »

the only difference with the April 15th release is that the kernel was replaced to the default bfs-kernel, see also here.
regards,
-p.
Logged

menotu
PCLinuxOS Tester
Super Villain
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11982

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐


« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2010, 10:46:38 AM »

And if you want to install and run the .bfs kernel just install it with Synaptic.

If you're unsure which kernel you currently have, open a terminal and type:

uname - a <press enter>

And that will show ya.
Logged

If you can keep you head while all around you are losing theirs, then you have misunderstood the situation.

PCLinuxOS 32bit & 64bit; 3.2.17bfs kernel, KDE 4.8.3; nvidia 295.53, Athlon 64 X2 4200+; 4GB Ram; NVidia GeForce 8400GS 1GB; x.org 1.10.4 ; 500GB/320GB
boehmb
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 25


« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2010, 11:01:25 AM »

What is the difference?  Does the bfs kernal fix something?
Logged
boehmb
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 25


« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2010, 11:07:32 AM »

Update...I just read about bfs schduling and will leave my kernel in place.  Thanks for the replies.  PCLOS working perfectly here on a dual-core Pentium 3.3 Ghz, 2GB ram, Geforce 8800GT, 10,000-rpm drive.
Logged
menotu
PCLinuxOS Tester
Super Villain
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11982

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐


« Reply #5 on: April 18, 2010, 11:08:56 AM »

What is the difference?  Does the bfs kernal fix something?

Some people report that it speeds up there system.

The .a64 kernel = for AMD CPUs

The .pae kernel = if you have 4GB of ram memory it will see all of it (whereas the other kernels will only see approx between 3GB to 3.5GB)

Note: if you do install a new kernel you have to reboot and that reboot can take a good few minutes as it needs to do its stuff first, but after that boot times should be back to normal
Logged

If you can keep you head while all around you are losing theirs, then you have misunderstood the situation.

PCLinuxOS 32bit & 64bit; 3.2.17bfs kernel, KDE 4.8.3; nvidia 295.53, Athlon 64 X2 4200+; 4GB Ram; NVidia GeForce 8400GS 1GB; x.org 1.10.4 ; 500GB/320GB
MCP
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 290


« Reply #6 on: April 18, 2010, 11:33:11 AM »

I have an AMD Phenom II X3 processor with 4 gig ram.  Would changing to either the .a64 or .pae kernel be recommended?  Or is my processor still a little too new to benefit from the other kernels?

MCP
Logged
YouCanToo
PCLinuxOS Tester
Hero Member
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 4246


Location: Lebanon, OR., USA


WWW
« Reply #7 on: April 18, 2010, 12:38:23 PM »

I have an AMD Phenom II X3 processor with 4 gig ram.  Would changing to either the .a64 or .pae kernel be recommended?  Or is my processor still a little too new to benefit from the other kernels?

MCP

Like Menotu posted above. If you want to see all your memory and not just 3.2 - 3.5 gig than use the .pae kernel.  If that is not a big deal to you than use the .a64 kernel. No your processor in not too new to benefit from using either.
 
Logged





Be sure to visit the NEW Knowledge Base


Linux is user-friendly- it's just picky who its friends are!
ternor
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1438



« Reply #8 on: April 19, 2010, 05:03:30 AM »

Are these releases the final 2010 iso or are they beta?  I can't find any formal announcement.
Logged

menotu
PCLinuxOS Tester
Super Villain
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11982

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐


« Reply #9 on: April 19, 2010, 05:10:11 AM »

Are these releases the final 2010 iso or are they beta?  I can't find any formal announcement.

Yup - they are final 2010 releases. No more big installs, we can all just "roll" along doing Synaptic updates
Logged

If you can keep you head while all around you are losing theirs, then you have misunderstood the situation.

PCLinuxOS 32bit & 64bit; 3.2.17bfs kernel, KDE 4.8.3; nvidia 295.53, Athlon 64 X2 4200+; 4GB Ram; NVidia GeForce 8400GS 1GB; x.org 1.10.4 ; 500GB/320GB
ternor
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1438



« Reply #10 on: April 19, 2010, 05:20:04 AM »

Thanks menotu.
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM