PCLinuxOS-Forums
News: ...FLASH!!! ...New PCLinuxOS Testing board now open. Register today! Be an active contributor to the PCLinuxOS future! ... Read all about it now, on THIS forum!!!..
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. May 24, 2012, 06:23:05 PM


Login with username, password and session length


Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Passwords tangled in Fifth Amendment  (Read 671 times)
menotu
PCLinuxOS Tester
Super Villain
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 11972

┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐


« Reply #15 on: February 06, 2012, 04:18:44 PM »

By David Kravets -  February 6, 2012  (wired)

Defendant Ordered to Decrypt Laptop May Have Forgotten Password

A Colorado woman ordered to decrypt her laptop so prosecutors may use the files against her in a criminal case might have forgotten the password, the defendant’s attorney said Monday.

The authorities seized the Toshiba laptop from defendant Ramona Fricosu in 2010 with a court warrant while investigating alleged mortgage fraud. Ruling that the woman’s Fifth Amendment rights against compelled self-incrimination would not be breached, U.S. District Judge Robert Blackburn ordered the woman in January to decrypt the laptop.

“It’s very possible to forget passwords,” the woman’s attorney, Philip Dubois, said in a telephone interview. “It’s not clear to me she was the one who set up the encryption on this drive. I don’t know if she will be able to decrypt it.”

...........................................

And now the case is even more complicated and raises the question of what might happen if the woman does not comply with the judge’s order.

If she does not decrypt the drive by month’s end, as ordered, she could be held in contempt and jailed until she complies. If the case gets to that point, Judge Blackburn would have to make a judgement call and determine whether the woman had forgotten the code or was refusing to comply.

“The government will probably say you need to put her in jail until she breaks down and does what she is ordered to do,” Dubois said. “That will create a question of fact for the judge to resolve. If she’s unable to decrypt the disc, the court cannot hold her in contempt.”

Prosecutor Patricia Davies said in a telephone interview that the defendant has not said in any court document that she might have forgotten the password.

“She has not taken that position in court,” Davis said. “When she does, we’ll figure it out.”

Full article
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/02/forgotten-password/
Logged

If you can keep you head while all around you are losing theirs, then you have misunderstood the situation.

PCLinuxOS 32bit & 64bit; 3.2.17bfs kernel, KDE 4.8.3; nvidia 295.53, Athlon 64 X2 4200+; 4GB Ram; NVidia GeForce 8400GS 1GB; x.org 1.10.4 ; 500GB/320GB
Bald Brick
PCLinuxOS Tester
Hero Member
*******
Online Online

Posts: 5138


I'm going South


« Reply #16 on: February 06, 2012, 05:27:45 PM »

It seems she's taken Crow's advice.  Wink
Logged

If it ain't broke
hit harder!

AMD Athlon 7450 Dual-Core Processor, 7.80 GiB RAM, Nvidia GeForce GT 120/PCIe/SSE2, OpenGL/ES-version: 3.3 0 NVIDIA 295.40, SBx00 Azalia (Intel HDA) soundcard, ‎Logitech B500 webcam, SAA7146 DVB card, HDDs: Seagate 250824AS, Western Digital WD10EAVS-00D
djohnston
PCLinuxOS Tester
Hero Member
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5691


I don't do Windows


« Reply #17 on: February 06, 2012, 10:14:30 PM »


Defendant Ordered to Decrypt Laptop May Have Forgotten Password


She won't have to plead the Fifth. She can rely on the Ronald Reagan defense. "I, I don't remember."  Wink
Logged

Bare metal                           VBox
AMD Athlon 7750 Dual-Core    Single core
4GiB RAM                              1GiB RAM
nVidia GeForce FX 5200          64MB video
LXDE 32bit                            KDE 64bit

Registered Linux User #416378
parnote
PCLinuxOS Tester
Hero Member
*******
Offline Offline

Posts: 3963


The truth is out there ... PCLinuxOS!


« Reply #18 on: February 07, 2012, 03:36:31 PM »

Sounds like it's time for a new encryption strategy. Two passwords. One decrypts the files. The other blanks the hard drive. With either one, there is no difference with the screen display ... it just shows progress bars and a message that it is working. In the end, however, there either are files or there aren't.

I'm not at all against going after criminals who have stored information related to their illicit activity on a computer's hard drive. But what I **am** against is an expansion of those demands to inspect the hard drives of innocent computer users in a "witch-hunt" atmosphere. It's only a matter of time, IMHO.
Logged

PCLinuxOS Magazine Chief Editor

Linux Registered User #485009

In a world without walls, who needs Windows?

PCLinuxOS Wiki: Contribute tips/tricks/how-to's!
AS
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4106

Have a nice ... night!


« Reply #19 on: February 07, 2012, 03:59:36 PM »

Sounds like it's time for a new encryption strategy. Two passwords. One decrypts the files. The other blanks the hard drive. With either one, there is no difference with the screen display ... it just shows progress bars and a message that it is working. In the end, however, there either are files or there aren't.

Technically speaking this already exists, actually a passphrase is used to access one or more decryption keys, and the key is used to decrypt the hard drive. Simply deleting the "key" (which is stored on few sectors) will make the content impossible to be decrypted, it is an instant process, so no progress bar.  Wink

Quote
I'm not at all against going after criminals who have stored information related to their illicit activity on a computer's hard drive. But what I **am** against is an expansion of those demands to inspect the hard drives of innocent computer users in a "witch-hunt" atmosphere. It's only a matter of time, IMHO.

+1

AS
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM